<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACR 4.3.1 hasn&#8217;t solved A700 high ISO mush problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/</link>
	<description>Search this site - over 170 articles on Alpha system topics! Subscribe to our magazine too!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Magnus_vb</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus_vb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-707</guid>
		<description>Mr Kilpatrick,

very interesting comparison. My favorite (at least until I can use Aperture again) is Raw Photo Processor. But I wonder if Sony IDC is that bad ;). I did my own test between Raw Developer, Raw Photo Processor and Sony. The result was:
1. RPP
2. Sony IDC
3. RD

I opened every processed file in Photoshop and did the usually post-processing to be as close as possible to "the real deal"

There was a very little different from RPP to IDC â€“ both on screen and in print (proof on a R2400). RD lacked details and looked more soft.

The image was taken at 640 ISO.

Regards, Magnus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Kilpatrick,</p>
<p>very interesting comparison. My favorite (at least until I can use Aperture again) is Raw Photo Processor. But I wonder if Sony IDC is that bad ;). I did my own test between Raw Developer, Raw Photo Processor and Sony. The result was:<br />
1. RPP<br />
2. Sony IDC<br />
3. RD</p>
<p>I opened every processed file in Photoshop and did the usually post-processing to be as close as possible to &#8220;the real deal&#8221;</p>
<p>There was a very little different from RPP to IDC â€“ both on screen and in print (proof on a R2400). RD lacked details and looked more soft.</p>
<p>The image was taken at 640 ISO.</p>
<p>Regards, Magnus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonolta</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonolta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-626</guid>
		<description>No problem, it's just that typos like that send us on the search to find V2.2...and of course waste a few minutes time in the process searching for something that does not even exist yet. :-)

-Sonolta

http://www.sonolta.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, it&#8217;s just that typos like that send us on the search to find V2.2&#8230;and of course waste a few minutes time in the process searching for something that does not even exist yet. <img src='http://www.photoclubalpha.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Sonolta</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonolta.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sonolta.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-625</guid>
		<description>Sorry, just a typo. Meant to be 2.0 - I don't usually bother with 2.0.1 etc. Will amend.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, just a typo. Meant to be 2.0 - I don&#8217;t usually bother with 2.0.1 etc. Will amend.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonolta</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonolta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 03:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-622</guid>
		<description>DK, I own an A700 serial x..308. I have put at least 10K shots on it at this point. I have had it for months and I received SR2 with it and I downloaded version SR: 2.0.01.09280 from Sony weeks ago. 

You are mistaken on what the vcurrent IDC version number is, what is available at Sony UK and Sony US is IDC SR: 2.0.01.09280.

http://esupport.sony.com/US/perl/swu-download.pl?mdl=DSLRA700&#38;upd_id=3158&#38;os_id=7280 not V2.2.

-Sonolta

http://www.sonolta.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DK, I own an A700 serial x..308. I have put at least 10K shots on it at this point. I have had it for months and I received SR2 with it and I downloaded version SR: 2.0.01.09280 from Sony weeks ago. </p>
<p>You are mistaken on what the vcurrent IDC version number is, what is available at Sony UK and Sony US is IDC SR: 2.0.01.09280.</p>
<p><a href="http://esupport.sony.com/US/perl/swu-download.pl?mdl=DSLRA700&amp;upd_id=3158&amp;os_id=7280" rel="nofollow">http://esupport.sony.com/US/perl/swu-download.pl?mdl=DSLRA700&amp;upd_id=3158&amp;os_id=7280</a> not V2.2.</p>
<p>-Sonolta</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonolta.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sonolta.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 02:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-621</guid>
		<description>You only get version 2 with the A700 - there is no ability to download it. There is an update for it included with the v2 A700 firmware options on the website, that's all.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You only get version 2 with the A700 - there is no ability to download it. There is an update for it included with the v2 A700 firmware options on the website, that&#8217;s all.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonolta</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonolta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 02:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>David - I don't see the IDC V 2.2 download on the US or UK Sony site yet. Please throw us a bone, man.

Thanks.

-Sonolta

http://www.sonolta.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David - I don&#8217;t see the IDC V 2.2 download on the US or UK Sony site yet. Please throw us a bone, man.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>-Sonolta</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonolta.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sonolta.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonolta</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonolta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 01:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2007/12/23/acr-431-hasnt-solved-a700-high-iso-mush-problems/#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Pretty much what I have found...ACR 4.3.1 is better but not yet great. I did some recent testing at ISO1000 and ACR 4.3.1 still can't match the clunky IDC 2.0.

I'll have some slow shutter ISO 1000 Xmas snaps up soon.

-Sonolta

http://www.sonolta.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much what I have found&#8230;ACR 4.3.1 is better but not yet great. I did some recent testing at ISO1000 and ACR 4.3.1 still can&#8217;t match the clunky IDC 2.0.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have some slow shutter ISO 1000 Xmas snaps up soon.</p>
<p>-Sonolta</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonolta.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sonolta.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
