<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 70,000 images entered in Sony World Photography Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/02/04/70000-images-entered-in-sony-world-photography-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/02/04/70000-images-entered-in-sony-world-photography-awards/</link>
	<description>Search this site - over 170 articles on Alpha system topics! Subscribe to our magazine too!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: karryp</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/02/04/70000-images-entered-in-sony-world-photography-awards/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>karryp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2008/02/04/70000-images-entered-in-sony-world-photography-awards/#comment-736</guid>
		<description>I did not realise that my comment would be visible to all (rather than just David and Shirley), so after the event perhaps it would be better if you could erase my comment.  
However, the URL for the Sony Forum is (if you are logged in to the competition site)
www.worldphotographyawards.org/forum
with the content appearing on
www.worldphotographyawards.org/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=1
and then the General Discussion about judging on
www.worldphotographyawards.org/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=85</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not realise that my comment would be visible to all (rather than just David and Shirley), so after the event perhaps it would be better if you could erase my comment.<br />
However, the URL for the Sony Forum is (if you are logged in to the competition site)<br />
<a href="http://www.worldphotographyawards.org/forum" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldphotographyawards.org/forum</a><br />
with the content appearing on<br />
<a href="http://www.worldphotographyawards.org/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldphotographyawards.org/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=1</a><br />
and then the General Discussion about judging on<br />
<a href="http://www.worldphotographyawards.org/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=85" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldphotographyawards.org/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=85</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/02/04/70000-images-entered-in-sony-world-photography-awards/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2008/02/04/70000-images-entered-in-sony-world-photography-awards/#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Can you give a URL for this forum Peter? As you will realise, SWPA is a concept sold to Sony by an independent entrpreneur, who would have had the Canon WPA or Samsung WPA just as willingly except for some good contact with Sony. I guess that a lot of the internal stuff, like the Travel Photographer of the Year Competition, is very much down to the independent side

The whole thing sounds like a nightmare - 70,000 entries compared to say 3,000 for a major international salon or pro competition, and even that takes several days for a proper judging panel to assess. Frankly, if you install a 'filter' system to chuck out 'clearly not winner' material at any early stage, you risk losing the winners as well, as good photography may be unconventional and it takes many opinions to avoid rejection of material which is not immediately reiminiscent of established winning styles.

But they wanted it big and they got it big.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you give a URL for this forum Peter? As you will realise, SWPA is a concept sold to Sony by an independent entrpreneur, who would have had the Canon WPA or Samsung WPA just as willingly except for some good contact with Sony. I guess that a lot of the internal stuff, like the Travel Photographer of the Year Competition, is very much down to the independent side</p>
<p>The whole thing sounds like a nightmare - 70,000 entries compared to say 3,000 for a major international salon or pro competition, and even that takes several days for a proper judging panel to assess. Frankly, if you install a &#8216;filter&#8217; system to chuck out &#8216;clearly not winner&#8217; material at any early stage, you risk losing the winners as well, as good photography may be unconventional and it takes many opinions to avoid rejection of material which is not immediately reiminiscent of established winning styles.</p>
<p>But they wanted it big and they got it big.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karryp</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/02/04/70000-images-entered-in-sony-world-photography-awards/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>karryp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2008/02/04/70000-images-entered-in-sony-world-photography-awards/#comment-732</guid>
		<description>I suggest that you look at the General Discussion on the Sony WPA Forum for Amateurs, as there has been several negative comments made about the recent announcement by Sony on the changes to the judging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest that you look at the General Discussion on the Sony WPA Forum for Amateurs, as there has been several negative comments made about the recent announcement by Sony on the changes to the judging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
