<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Camera Raw 4.4 supports A200, 300, 350</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/03/14/adobe-camera-raw-44-supports-a200-300-350/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/03/14/adobe-camera-raw-44-supports-a200-300-350/</link>
	<description>Search this site - over 170 articles on Alpha system topics! Subscribe to our magazine too!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: fother</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/03/14/adobe-camera-raw-44-supports-a200-300-350/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>fother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2008/03/14/adobe-camera-raw-44-supports-a200-300-350/#comment-851</guid>
		<description>David,

The update has been withdrawn by adobe due to some bugs. Adobe are advising uninstalling it and restoring the previous version (ACR 4.3.1 / Lightroom 1.3.1)

Details at: http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/03/important_lightroom_14_and_cam.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>The update has been withdrawn by adobe due to some bugs. Adobe are advising uninstalling it and restoring the previous version (ACR 4.3.1 / Lightroom 1.3.1)</p>
<p>Details at: <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/03/important_lightroom_14_and_cam.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/03/important_lightroom_14_and_cam.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonolta</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/03/14/adobe-camera-raw-44-supports-a200-300-350/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonolta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/2008/03/14/adobe-camera-raw-44-supports-a200-300-350/#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Well, nice to see ACR updated to work with the new Sony cams...too bad the jury is still out on the A700 ACR performance.

Below are about 50 ACR 4.3.1 A700 ISO 3200 cheerleader examples mixed in with a few camera JPGs:

http://www.rockriverfootball.com/raptors/v/cheerleader+images/pre-season+cheerleading/

I now have over 100 ISO 3200 ACR 4.3.1 shots mixed in with a few camera jpgs in this arena football gallery.

http://www.rockriverfootball.com/raptors/v/rock+river+raptors+cifl+pre-season/

Even though ACR may not produce the optimum A700 output..it's ease of use usually outweighs any image degradation drawbacks.

I suppose if we don't see any dramatic changes in A700 ACR performance in the next ACR update, I suspect that we will be stuck with ACR's a700 performance forever.

-Sonolta

http://www.sonolta.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, nice to see ACR updated to work with the new Sony cams&#8230;too bad the jury is still out on the A700 ACR performance.</p>
<p>Below are about 50 ACR 4.3.1 A700 ISO 3200 cheerleader examples mixed in with a few camera JPGs:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rockriverfootball.com/raptors/v/cheerleader+images/pre-season+cheerleading/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rockriverfootball.com/raptors/v/cheerleader+images/pre-season+cheerleading/</a></p>
<p>I now have over 100 ISO 3200 ACR 4.3.1 shots mixed in with a few camera jpgs in this arena football gallery.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rockriverfootball.com/raptors/v/rock+river+raptors+cifl+pre-season/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rockriverfootball.com/raptors/v/rock+river+raptors+cifl+pre-season/</a></p>
<p>Even though ACR may not produce the optimum A700 output..it&#8217;s ease of use usually outweighs any image degradation drawbacks.</p>
<p>I suppose if we don&#8217;t see any dramatic changes in A700 ACR performance in the next ACR update, I suspect that we will be stuck with ACR&#8217;s a700 performance forever.</p>
<p>-Sonolta</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonolta.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sonolta.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
