<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Tele-Macro LD Di</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/06/06/tamron-70-300mm-f4-56-tele-macro-ld-di/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/06/06/tamron-70-300mm-f4-56-tele-macro-ld-di/</link>
	<description>Search this site - over 170 articles on Alpha system topics! Subscribe to our magazine too!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: springm</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/06/06/tamron-70-300mm-f4-56-tele-macro-ld-di/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>springm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=744#comment-968</guid>
		<description>David, your comments on the tamron as well as the SAL 70-300G made me decide in favor of the tamron - I expect the SAL to be a better performer but weight and price I regard as too high for the expected purpose of coming along on missions to 3rd world countries. So I ordered the tamron for 135,- € and took it out for a first field test last weekend. The performance I would describe as excellent in comparison to the low price, and the bokeh as well as the macro possibilities are just amazing. See &lt;a href="http://spring2life.blogspot.com/2008/06/more-barley-and-poppy-flowers.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;spring2life: barley and poppy flowers&lt;/a&gt;. I discovered some CA, especially on the long end, but could easily correct it with a gimp plugin on this shot of the &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/springm/2580297442/in/set-72157600790341795/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Anger village church&lt;/a&gt;. Thank you for your review which really helped me with my decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, your comments on the tamron as well as the SAL 70-300G made me decide in favor of the tamron - I expect the SAL to be a better performer but weight and price I regard as too high for the expected purpose of coming along on missions to 3rd world countries. So I ordered the tamron for 135,- € and took it out for a first field test last weekend. The performance I would describe as excellent in comparison to the low price, and the bokeh as well as the macro possibilities are just amazing. See <a href="http://spring2life.blogspot.com/2008/06/more-barley-and-poppy-flowers.html" rel="nofollow">spring2life: barley and poppy flowers</a>. I discovered some CA, especially on the long end, but could easily correct it with a gimp plugin on this shot of the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/springm/2580297442/in/set-72157600790341795/" rel="nofollow">Anger village church</a>. Thank you for your review which really helped me with my decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sony-alpha</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/06/06/tamron-70-300mm-f4-56-tele-macro-ld-di/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>sony-alpha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=744#comment-964</guid>
		<description>Sony Alpha lenses are very expensive.
Tamron AF70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Lens,
Quality product, extremely versatile lens, moderately priced.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony Alpha lenses are very expensive.<br />
Tamron AF70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Lens,<br />
Quality product, extremely versatile lens, moderately priced.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
