<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alpha 900 launch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/</link>
	<description>Search this site - over 170 articles on Alpha system topics! Subscribe to our magazine too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:11:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: - J -</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>- J -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=881#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>A900 launch will be 09.09 in internet, i will get camera at 11.09 to try for one day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A900 launch will be 09.09 in internet, i will get camera at 11.09 to try for one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyptak</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>andyptak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=881#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>The 16-80 is a lovely lens and the ones who bash it obviously don&#039;t own one and use it every day. I recently retired it when I bought it&#039;s new and more expensive sibling. That didn&#039;t last too long though, because as an all around general purpose lens it does the job superbly. Yes, the build is a bit flimsy in comparison to other Zeiss models, but look at the features you get for the price!

My only complaint is vignetting, even a slim polariser causes problems, which mars an otherwise under appreciated lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 16-80 is a lovely lens and the ones who bash it obviously don&#8217;t own one and use it every day. I recently retired it when I bought it&#8217;s new and more expensive sibling. That didn&#8217;t last too long though, because as an all around general purpose lens it does the job superbly. Yes, the build is a bit flimsy in comparison to other Zeiss models, but look at the features you get for the price!</p>
<p>My only complaint is vignetting, even a slim polariser causes problems, which mars an otherwise under appreciated lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=881#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>August 14th - they announced the e-Book, two Cybershot models, two musicphones (iPhone/pod type things) and some technology - but no A900.

Ref A700 and glass - while everyone has criticised the build and feel of the Zeiss 16-80mm, there has never really been a suggestion that the optics are influenced much by the mount design. For an architect, a lens like the 16-80mm is extremely useful and nothing else will give you the same rendering of textures, fabrics and surfaces (it has very high MTF at high frequencies - where the other zoom lenses only have listed 10 lppm and 30 lppm MTF charts, the 16-80mm includes a 40 lppm chart, like the other Zeiss designs). My 16-80mm has been in use for over a year now and is used all the time, main lens. It&#039;s doing fine and shows no sign of wear though it looks a bit scruffy from handling.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>August 14th &#8211; they announced the e-Book, two Cybershot models, two musicphones (iPhone/pod type things) and some technology &#8211; but no A900.</p>
<p>Ref A700 and glass &#8211; while everyone has criticised the build and feel of the Zeiss 16-80mm, there has never really been a suggestion that the optics are influenced much by the mount design. For an architect, a lens like the 16-80mm is extremely useful and nothing else will give you the same rendering of textures, fabrics and surfaces (it has very high MTF at high frequencies &#8211; where the other zoom lenses only have listed 10 lppm and 30 lppm MTF charts, the 16-80mm includes a 40 lppm chart, like the other Zeiss designs). My 16-80mm has been in use for over a year now and is used all the time, main lens. It&#8217;s doing fine and shows no sign of wear though it looks a bit scruffy from handling.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael01</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=881#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>I am just about to &#039;invest&#039; in an A-700. Problem is with the lens selection. I am used to the Fujifilm S7000 (which, although not DSLR, is very versatile in many ways). I do a lot of outdoor, but also close-ups and interior (with a tripod whenever needed) - in other words, fairly wide range.  Might help to add I am architect...  I read a very good review for the Sony 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* SAL-2470Z zoom lens (pricey as it may be), and made a note NOT to buy the Sony 18-70mm f/3.5-5.6 or the Sony 16-80mm f/3.5-4.5 DT Carl Zeiss.

Since you mentioned about your Zeiss &#039;glass&#039;, I would much appreciate some suggestions.  I don&#039;t upgrade often - if that helps. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just about to &#8216;invest&#8217; in an A-700. Problem is with the lens selection. I am used to the Fujifilm S7000 (which, although not DSLR, is very versatile in many ways). I do a lot of outdoor, but also close-ups and interior (with a tripod whenever needed) &#8211; in other words, fairly wide range.  Might help to add I am architect&#8230;  I read a very good review for the Sony 24-70mm F2.8 ZA SSM Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* SAL-2470Z zoom lens (pricey as it may be), and made a note NOT to buy the Sony 18-70mm f/3.5-5.6 or the Sony 16-80mm f/3.5-4.5 DT Carl Zeiss.</p>
<p>Since you mentioned about your Zeiss &#8216;glass&#8217;, I would much appreciate some suggestions.  I don&#8217;t upgrade often &#8211; if that helps. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexramos</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>alexramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=881#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>What Sony announced today 14th??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Sony announced today 14th??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyptak</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>andyptak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=881#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>I dropped a 30 year relationship with Pentax for the A700 and I can&#039;t wait to get my hands on the A900, or whatever it&#039;s called. I just wonder how much though? Selling all of my Pentax gear, including my beloved LX&#039;s, barely made a dent in the purchase price of a couple of A700&#039;s and associated Zeiss glass. I hope I can afford this baby and that&#039;s not just gear lust talking, I think it will raise the bar of client expectations quite considerably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dropped a 30 year relationship with Pentax for the A700 and I can&#8217;t wait to get my hands on the A900, or whatever it&#8217;s called. I just wonder how much though? Selling all of my Pentax gear, including my beloved LX&#8217;s, barely made a dent in the purchase price of a couple of A700&#8217;s and associated Zeiss glass. I hope I can afford this baby and that&#8217;s not just gear lust talking, I think it will raise the bar of client expectations quite considerably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novak</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-1103</link>
		<dc:creator>novak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=881#comment-1103</guid>
		<description>my bet is on naming it A9 - so 100&#039; names for amateur to semi-pros (A200 to A700). A50 to A90 for advanced semi pro  (APC-S) line (to come with all the belts and whistles such as GPS, movie mode etc.) and A5 to A9 for full frame pro line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my bet is on naming it A9 &#8211; so 100&#8242; names for amateur to semi-pros (A200 to A700). A50 to A90 for advanced semi pro  (APC-S) line (to come with all the belts and whistles such as GPS, movie mode etc.) and A5 to A9 for full frame pro line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=881#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>I can not confirm that. The term &#039;Alpha Pro&#039; has been used by one member of Sony UK Alpha team, referring to the project they have been working on this summer with roadshows and training for dealers. &#039;Alpha Pro&#039; may just mean Alpha 700 plus Alpha 900 plus new lenses, and a drive to hit new professional buyers. Or it could be that the camera will be called the Alpha Pro, Alpha Pro 900, or something else. I honestly don&#039;t know.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can not confirm that. The term &#8216;Alpha Pro&#8217; has been used by one member of Sony UK Alpha team, referring to the project they have been working on this summer with roadshows and training for dealers. &#8216;Alpha Pro&#8217; may just mean Alpha 700 plus Alpha 900 plus new lenses, and a drive to hit new professional buyers. Or it could be that the camera will be called the Alpha Pro, Alpha Pro 900, or something else. I honestly don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lingoting</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/08/13/alpha-900-launch/comment-page-1/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>lingoting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=881#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>Is it going to be called A900 ?thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it going to be called A900 ?thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
