<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DxO Optics Pro &#8211; cRAW, high ISO both fixed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/10/22/dxo-optics-pro-craw-high-iso-both-fixed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/10/22/dxo-optics-pro-craw-high-iso-both-fixed/</link>
	<description>Search this site - over 170 articles on Alpha system topics! Subscribe to our magazine too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: springtide</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/10/22/dxo-optics-pro-craw-high-iso-both-fixed/comment-page-1/#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>springtide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1133#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve owned DXO since v4 and have paid for the upgrades, but since switching to a Sony camera (from my KM 7D) I have probably had camera support for approx 4 months.

DXO took probably 9 months since the A700 release to start supporting camera, and now I&#039;m upgraded to an A900 I&#039;m dead in the water again.

I do like the software and it does seem to do a reasonable job with High ISO files, but I can&#039;t say I feel I can really commit to the software anymore.

DXO if you are listening, please please please give us Sony users better support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve owned DXO since v4 and have paid for the upgrades, but since switching to a Sony camera (from my KM 7D) I have probably had camera support for approx 4 months.</p>
<p>DXO took probably 9 months since the A700 release to start supporting camera, and now I&#8217;m upgraded to an A900 I&#8217;m dead in the water again.</p>
<p>I do like the software and it does seem to do a reasonable job with High ISO files, but I can&#8217;t say I feel I can really commit to the software anymore.</p>
<p>DXO if you are listening, please please please give us Sony users better support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hobbitofny</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2008/10/22/dxo-optics-pro-craw-high-iso-both-fixed/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobbitofny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1133#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>The update does wonders for the A350 at higher iso settings. I recommend it.  Now if I could understand no 70-200mm 2.8 or even the cheap 70-300mm for the A350 profile. Dxo makes a great software package, but the Sony support is not where it should be. At least I am not happy with what is missing on the lens list.

The important thing is I can get better images at the higher iso settings now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The update does wonders for the A350 at higher iso settings. I recommend it.  Now if I could understand no 70-200mm 2.8 or even the cheap 70-300mm for the A350 profile. Dxo makes a great software package, but the Sony support is not where it should be. At least I am not happy with what is missing on the lens list.</p>
<p>The important thing is I can get better images at the higher iso settings now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
