<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony at Focus on Imaging (report)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/02/25/sony-at-focus-in-imaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/02/25/sony-at-focus-in-imaging/</link>
	<description>Search this site - over 170 articles on Alpha system topics! Subscribe to our magazine too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/02/25/sony-at-focus-in-imaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1266#comment-1648</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s already known that further Zeiss lenses are planned for Sony, mainly a 24mm f/1.4 (or similarly fast) and possibly a much shorter fast lens. No-one can guess, in the present economic climate, exactly when prototypes will be shown.

The Zeiss lenses for Nikon are mostly Cosina lenses produced with Zeiss co-operation, based on revisions of classic designs which Cosina&#039;s own design team undertook without being asked by Zeiss. They issued these lenses using the Voigtlander name, which they had acquired the rights to use, along with a rangefinder camera system. Zeiss were sufficiently impressed by the results to commission their own rangefinder system from Cosina,and to set up a joint operation producing Zeiss branded lenses with CZ engineers and quality control installed in Japan. Cosina also still makes the Voigtlander &#039;designs&#039; (all of them are really Cosina designs at heart) and you can get them for half the price of the closest Zeiss versions.

Initially, these were all made in M42 screw thread only, but to differentiate the Zeiss ranges dedicated manual mount versions appeared, and the M42 versions were either dropped or simply became unavailable. There is some suggestion that they also ceased making M42 fit because of the Sony deal with Zeiss.

Whatever the case, the two licensing arrangements are entirely separate. CZ&#039;s venture with Sony is in a different factory, uses a different design team, and has completely different type of mechanical construction. The designs are all new, not &#039;new glass revisions&#039; of classic Zeiss glass like Distagons and Biogons, even though they are described as Vario-Sonnars etc. Some lens types can no longer be made because of restrictions on the use of lead and other additives to the glass (this is also why various Minolta prime lens designs can not be re-issued).

Recently, Zeiss in Germany started making some of the lenses sold in the new (Cosina) range. Exchange rates and production costs have shifted around enough to make £1000 lenses worth building in Germany again. There is no suggestion that we will see Sony Zeiss lenses made in Germany. The 21mm and 18mm Distagons are examples - and the 20mm Minolta design currently issued as Sony is not, in fact, all that inferior to the Zeiss glass. It was considered far superior to the Leica 19mm f2.8 when first made. Sony probably considers it to fill that gap with no need for Zeiss alternatives.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s already known that further Zeiss lenses are planned for Sony, mainly a 24mm f/1.4 (or similarly fast) and possibly a much shorter fast lens. No-one can guess, in the present economic climate, exactly when prototypes will be shown.</p>
<p>The Zeiss lenses for Nikon are mostly Cosina lenses produced with Zeiss co-operation, based on revisions of classic designs which Cosina&#8217;s own design team undertook without being asked by Zeiss. They issued these lenses using the Voigtlander name, which they had acquired the rights to use, along with a rangefinder camera system. Zeiss were sufficiently impressed by the results to commission their own rangefinder system from Cosina,and to set up a joint operation producing Zeiss branded lenses with CZ engineers and quality control installed in Japan. Cosina also still makes the Voigtlander &#8216;designs&#8217; (all of them are really Cosina designs at heart) and you can get them for half the price of the closest Zeiss versions.</p>
<p>Initially, these were all made in M42 screw thread only, but to differentiate the Zeiss ranges dedicated manual mount versions appeared, and the M42 versions were either dropped or simply became unavailable. There is some suggestion that they also ceased making M42 fit because of the Sony deal with Zeiss.</p>
<p>Whatever the case, the two licensing arrangements are entirely separate. CZ&#8217;s venture with Sony is in a different factory, uses a different design team, and has completely different type of mechanical construction. The designs are all new, not &#8216;new glass revisions&#8217; of classic Zeiss glass like Distagons and Biogons, even though they are described as Vario-Sonnars etc. Some lens types can no longer be made because of restrictions on the use of lead and other additives to the glass (this is also why various Minolta prime lens designs can not be re-issued).</p>
<p>Recently, Zeiss in Germany started making some of the lenses sold in the new (Cosina) range. Exchange rates and production costs have shifted around enough to make £1000 lenses worth building in Germany again. There is no suggestion that we will see Sony Zeiss lenses made in Germany. The 21mm and 18mm Distagons are examples &#8211; and the 20mm Minolta design currently issued as Sony is not, in fact, all that inferior to the Zeiss glass. It was considered far superior to the Leica 19mm f2.8 when first made. Sony probably considers it to fill that gap with no need for Zeiss alternatives.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harryshin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/02/25/sony-at-focus-in-imaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>harryshin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1266#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>david: 

1.  what is your best guess as to whether or not Carl Zeiss is going to come out with any more full frame lens, specifically prime lens? 

2.  related to the above question--&gt; why is it that Carl Zeiss has come out with a fair number of prime lens for the Nikon / Canon and even Pentax mount, including the 21mm distagon, but only two for the Sony?   


thanks for any information.  harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>david: </p>
<p>1.  what is your best guess as to whether or not Carl Zeiss is going to come out with any more full frame lens, specifically prime lens? </p>
<p>2.  related to the above question&#8211;&gt; why is it that Carl Zeiss has come out with a fair number of prime lens for the Nikon / Canon and even Pentax mount, including the 21mm distagon, but only two for the Sony?   </p>
<p>thanks for any information.  harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaturner</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/02/25/sony-at-focus-in-imaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1646</link>
		<dc:creator>gaturner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1266#comment-1646</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your report David, I went on Monday and can endorse your comment about how popular the Sony stand was throughout the day. However, it was well worth queuing for the opportunity to select body and lens combinations to try out, using my CF card to examine the results later. That culminated in the A900 with vertical grip plus the 300mm f2.8 G SSM - wow, what a combination -and what a weight!! Also, really enjoyed the lovely 70-200mm G SSM and CZ 85mm f1.4, all beyond my budget unfortunately, but hey, you can dream can&#039;t you? I was impressed by the welcoming and friendly staff on the stand, and highlights for me were meeting both Duncan and Gustav and hearing them talk about their fabulous work. Somehow, I managed to resist the multiple temptations of that massive orange wall on the Jacobs stand, for this year anyway, but I&#039;ll be back next March (7th-10th) as there&#039;s so much of interest to see and learn from at the show. Highly recommended! (I guess I&#039;d have heard by now if I&#039;d won the A900/CZ 24-70 in the prize draw...) Glenn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your report David, I went on Monday and can endorse your comment about how popular the Sony stand was throughout the day. However, it was well worth queuing for the opportunity to select body and lens combinations to try out, using my CF card to examine the results later. That culminated in the A900 with vertical grip plus the 300mm f2.8 G SSM &#8211; wow, what a combination -and what a weight!! Also, really enjoyed the lovely 70-200mm G SSM and CZ 85mm f1.4, all beyond my budget unfortunately, but hey, you can dream can&#8217;t you? I was impressed by the welcoming and friendly staff on the stand, and highlights for me were meeting both Duncan and Gustav and hearing them talk about their fabulous work. Somehow, I managed to resist the multiple temptations of that massive orange wall on the Jacobs stand, for this year anyway, but I&#8217;ll be back next March (7th-10th) as there&#8217;s so much of interest to see and learn from at the show. Highly recommended! (I guess I&#8217;d have heard by now if I&#8217;d won the A900/CZ 24-70 in the prize draw&#8230;) Glenn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/02/25/sony-at-focus-in-imaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1266#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t suppress the truth! Actually, the first photo I took there features a slightly pot-bellied shambolic visitor looking in the showcase - I actually waited until someone &#039;serious&#039; came along not looking like the usual cariacature Focus visitor - and with your pen and list of items, you were exactly what I was waiting for - a picture which tells a story, not just someone gawking at a showcase. So I&#039;m afraid you ended up as a target for an intended magazine report illo.

Here&#039;s a picture which I prefer in the creative aspect, but the pen/paper is not recognisable and the Sony products are sidelined to Sigma items in the bottom of the case. I spoke to Sigma about getting a 15mm fisheye after finding the old focus-confirm one so useful, but all the shots I took with the £90 lens are just fine, and it shoved into the bit in my old Tenba bag where I normally put batteries and stuff - it&#039;s half the size of a new one.

http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/image/109587016

Thanks for re-subscribing!

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t suppress the truth! Actually, the first photo I took there features a slightly pot-bellied shambolic visitor looking in the showcase &#8211; I actually waited until someone &#8216;serious&#8217; came along not looking like the usual cariacature Focus visitor &#8211; and with your pen and list of items, you were exactly what I was waiting for &#8211; a picture which tells a story, not just someone gawking at a showcase. So I&#8217;m afraid you ended up as a target for an intended magazine report illo.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a picture which I prefer in the creative aspect, but the pen/paper is not recognisable and the Sony products are sidelined to Sigma items in the bottom of the case. I spoke to Sigma about getting a 15mm fisheye after finding the old focus-confirm one so useful, but all the shots I took with the £90 lens are just fine, and it shoved into the bit in my old Tenba bag where I normally put batteries and stuff &#8211; it&#8217;s half the size of a new one.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/image/109587016" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick/image/109587016</a></p>
<p>Thanks for re-subscribing!</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj_h</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/02/25/sony-at-focus-in-imaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>aj_h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1266#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>I tried out the s/h Tamron and it seemed to work fine but was missing the lens hood and was not all that much less than a new one from them. Interesting to see the 70-400 G in the flesh, I have the 70-300 G and the increased size probably accounts for the extra cost! I was impressed Jacobs were doing the A900 for £1499, but I&#039;m still happy with the A700 - your article on &#039;Do you really need an A900&#039; is a good antidote to upgrade-itus.

I had a subscription to Photoworld when I purchased my KM5D - in order to keep your other photo under wraps I&#039;ve just re-subscribed ;-)

Ant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried out the s/h Tamron and it seemed to work fine but was missing the lens hood and was not all that much less than a new one from them. Interesting to see the 70-400 G in the flesh, I have the 70-300 G and the increased size probably accounts for the extra cost! I was impressed Jacobs were doing the A900 for £1499, but I&#8217;m still happy with the A700 &#8211; your article on &#8216;Do you really need an A900&#8242; is a good antidote to upgrade-itus.</p>
<p>I had a subscription to Photoworld when I purchased my KM5D &#8211; in order to keep your other photo under wraps I&#8217;ve just re-subscribed <img src='http://www.photoclubalpha.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/02/25/sony-at-focus-in-imaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1266#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>I nearly handed you a leaflet for photoclubalpha! That was partly why I was there, giving some leaflets to Cameraworld. Was it their s/h Tamron you bought? I&#039;ve just been testing the unknown-mount Teleplus Pro 300 converter and it turns out to be a vintage Mx-AF (the eight contacts were put in to allow the power zoom). For whatever reason, it permits SSM to work, which most new converters even with 8 contacts do not (Sigma&#039;s 1.4X for example). Quality is modest on the 70-300mm SSM at 300mm though, and it reports the wrong aperture and focal length as the converter is not correctly chipped. Maybe this is what allows SSM to function. I&#039;m keeping it until my ordered Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 HSM arrives, in case it works with it, unlike Sigma&#039;s own converters.

Now I&#039;ve just got to find the REALLY unflattering angle and post another shot :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I nearly handed you a leaflet for photoclubalpha! That was partly why I was there, giving some leaflets to Cameraworld. Was it their s/h Tamron you bought? I&#8217;ve just been testing the unknown-mount Teleplus Pro 300 converter and it turns out to be a vintage Mx-AF (the eight contacts were put in to allow the power zoom). For whatever reason, it permits SSM to work, which most new converters even with 8 contacts do not (Sigma&#8217;s 1.4X for example). Quality is modest on the 70-300mm SSM at 300mm though, and it reports the wrong aperture and focal length as the converter is not correctly chipped. Maybe this is what allows SSM to function. I&#8217;m keeping it until my ordered Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 HSM arrives, in case it works with it, unlike Sigma&#8217;s own converters.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;ve just got to find the REALLY unflattering angle and post another shot <img src='http://www.photoclubalpha.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj_h</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/02/25/sony-at-focus-in-imaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>aj_h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1266#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>Did you get a model release form for that guy staring at the lenses ;-) I&#039;m glad to have provided some scale for you, I&#039;d have said hello if I had known. Only came back with a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8.

Ant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you get a model release form for that guy staring at the lenses <img src='http://www.photoclubalpha.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;m glad to have provided some scale for you, I&#8217;d have said hello if I had known. Only came back with a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8.</p>
<p>Ant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: braeside</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/02/25/sony-at-focus-in-imaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>braeside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1266#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the report David. You did well to restrain yourself from purchasing all the bargains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the report David. You did well to restrain yourself from purchasing all the bargains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
