Alpha on Amazon

Subscribe to Cameracraft

Cameracraft is one of the highest quality photo enthusiast magazines you'll find - worldwide. Our Photoclubalpha subscription deal is £20 less (UK) than the full annual cost for six editions. You can cancel at any time on Paypal or by contacting us.

Postal Region

PDF hi-res download version

Payment Options

Photoclubalpha Forum

Join our free Forum for a wealth of info, great company and some fantastic photo sharing threads! Registration on the Forum is separate from Registration on the website, but you are allowed to register using the same name and password.
  • Give it Your Best Shot • Re: Fog January 29, 2024
    Beautiful B&W images. Thank you.Statistics: Posted by Fotogeorge — Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:07 pm
    Fotogeorge
  • Give it Your Best Shot • Re: Fog January 28, 2024
    Wonderful photo.I thought this forum was dead. Glad there is still a bit of a heartbeat. Statistics: Posted by bakubo — Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:01 am
    bakubo
  • Give it Your Best Shot • Re: Fog January 28, 2024
    Thanks everyone!Here's another one from the Cahokia Mounds state park. Low fog during an autumn sunset.Statistics: Posted by smulnik — Sun Jan 28, 2024 8:18 pm
    smulnik
  • Give it Your Best Shot • Re: Sunsets & Sunrises January 28, 2024
    Thanks guys!A frozen Horseshoe lake. The lake is only about 6 feet deep and freezes quickly. It's just 10 minutes from my house, so it's one of my quick go-to places if it looks there is going to be a nice sunrise or sunset.SigSunrise SunsetStatistics: Posted by smulnik — Sun Jan 28, 2024 7:51 pm
    smulnik
  • Give it Your Best Shot • Re: Sunsets & Sunrises December 22, 2023
    Like them all Sig, but I prefer the vertical one. SuryStatistics: Posted by sury — Fri Dec 22, 2023 6:11 am
    sury

Past Article Calendar

August 2009
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Crop or cram? Pixel density versus the big view…

Detail section comparisons

Finally, for those who can’t use the bandwidth to view the pBase file (it is pretty exhausting) here are three detail crops. The first crop is a 600 x 400 pixel 100% section of an Alpha 900 file as seen already:

a900-70300G@200mm-cropAPSC-detail

Next, a 600 x 400 pixel crop from an Alpha 700 file which has first been REDUCED to 3960 pixels wide to match the actual size of the A900 APS-C crop:

a700-70200sig-iso320-justCA-detail

Finally, a 600 x 400 crop from an Alpha 380 file which has also been REDUCED t 3960 pixels wide:

a380-70300G-iso400-detail

Allowing for differences between lenses, I feel that the Alpha 380 yields the finest detail and highest sharpness of the three, for a given final output size – the Alpha 700 has the least visible noise, but is also fairly soft in rendering. The 700 image would lend itself best of all to unsharp masking for reproduction.

Here is a different set of three, all taken with the 70-200mm Sigma at 200mm, and all resized this time to match the Alpha 380 – so the A700 and A900 sections are enlarged to 14.2 megapixel equivalent, from 10.7 and 12.2 respectively:

a380-70200-nativesize

Alpha 380 – native size

a700-70200-380size

Alpha 700 scaled up to match

a900-70200-380size

Alpha 900 scaled up to match. Please remember – none of these files are sharpened for capture, or unsharp masked for web, none have noise reduction applied. I do not believe the softness of the A900 result is due to focus, it’s purely down to enlarging the data that little bit more.

This is not an unexpected result, as the 14.2 megapixel CCD is well-proven for high resolution results. What makes the difference is that the A380 ISO seems slightly understated, and ISO 200 can be used where 250 or 320 would be needed on the 700 for the same midtone brightness. All three cameras do a good job of retaining difficult highlight tones in the cricket whites but overexposure is to be avoided if possible!

– David Kilpatrick


Pages: 1 2 3 4

3 comments to Crop or cram? Pixel density versus the big view…

  • Photorer

    A very interesting comparison……

    Three generations of Alpha – ok, well two and a half, because the A100 was the first generation!

    The improvements in the image quality are quite interesting to note. The A900 has better quality than the A700, but the A380 is possibly the best for a small resolution image. It would be interesting to see the direct comparison (at 100%) between the three cameras, with the same lens at the same settings. I am sure that the 24Mpx A900 will produce better detail in a print or overall image, because of the relatively smaller pixels, but the A380 may well surprise us all.

    Thanks for taking the time to think this one out!

  • admin

    Yes, I think the 14 megapixel sensor is up to the quality of the A100 sensor, probably better. It has a better handling of highlight to shadow range, and more subtle colour. The colour is the biggest difference, some will prefer the A100. I definitely think it could be used in a better body, and the complaints made about high ISO noise are not entirely justified. It can turn in very good results at 400 and 800.

  • alexramos

    Hi Davie, good article…

    what is your opinion about this 14MPx CCD??

    Do you think this CCD could be use in a better body??

    Do you think this 14MPx CCD can reach the imagen quality of a100 sensor??