<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7fps &#8211; marketing point or real benefit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/08/27/7fps-alpha-550/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/08/27/7fps-alpha-550/</link>
	<description>Search this site - over 170 articles on Alpha system topics! Subscribe to our magazine too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: plevyadophy</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/08/27/7fps-alpha-550/comment-page-1/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>plevyadophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1715#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>Sir,

Thank you VERY much for the very prompt response.

And once again, you have added a HUGE amount to my education in photography.

Thanks.

Regards,

plevyadophy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,</p>
<p>Thank you VERY much for the very prompt response.</p>
<p>And once again, you have added a HUGE amount to my education in photography.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>plevyadophy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/08/27/7fps-alpha-550/comment-page-1/#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1715#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>The Press already uses frames from video when needed, I&#039;ve been asked many times over the years to extract frames from videos (even going to old tape days) for newspaper use. The HD Video standards - whether 1280 x 720, or 1920 x 1080 - are so much bigger than old VHS, and the information is far more detailed. As I hope I have shown, a Nikon 24fps 720p video is not far off being the same as a 24 fps motordrive sequence with a &#039;One Megapixel&#039; camera. The Canon 5D MkII when it first came out made the equivalent of 2 megapixel still frames, but at very slow shutter speeds - generally, 1/60th or so was the fastest. 

The Press users were frustrated in the extreme - if they shot video, the images were sharp enough to extract for half page newspaper use, but they could not freeze movement. Canon then introduced new firmware which allowed the 5D MkII videos to be shot with full control over shutter, aperture and ISO instead of programmed control. The camera can now be safely used to film video-takes of events, knowing that if a really great moment happens, a pin sharp 2 megapixel frame can be extracted with 30 fps &#039;drive&#039; to catch exactly the right expression or action.

The EOS 500D is not much use as it lacks the firmware and shoots everything at slow shutter speeds - bump up the ISO, and it just stops the lens down more! The Nikon D90, D5000 and D300S are all pretty useful as using A mode can force fast shutter speeds in video. Regular video producers do not like fast shutters, they think it makes action look jerky and prefer slight blur. I love video with fast shutter speeds.

Press shooters are often being trained up to shoot video clips, newspapers can syndicate to TV or use vids on their websites. But the majority of shots continue to be still frames. There are predictions (not mine) that one day, it will all be video, and all still frames will be extracted from even higher quality HD video than we have today.

If you want to analyse someone&#039;s golf swing, 5fps is useless, 10fps is nearly useless, 24fps is acceptable, 30fps is good and 60fps is perfect. 

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Press already uses frames from video when needed, I&#8217;ve been asked many times over the years to extract frames from videos (even going to old tape days) for newspaper use. The HD Video standards &#8211; whether 1280 x 720, or 1920 x 1080 &#8211; are so much bigger than old VHS, and the information is far more detailed. As I hope I have shown, a Nikon 24fps 720p video is not far off being the same as a 24 fps motordrive sequence with a &#8216;One Megapixel&#8217; camera. The Canon 5D MkII when it first came out made the equivalent of 2 megapixel still frames, but at very slow shutter speeds &#8211; generally, 1/60th or so was the fastest. </p>
<p>The Press users were frustrated in the extreme &#8211; if they shot video, the images were sharp enough to extract for half page newspaper use, but they could not freeze movement. Canon then introduced new firmware which allowed the 5D MkII videos to be shot with full control over shutter, aperture and ISO instead of programmed control. The camera can now be safely used to film video-takes of events, knowing that if a really great moment happens, a pin sharp 2 megapixel frame can be extracted with 30 fps &#8216;drive&#8217; to catch exactly the right expression or action.</p>
<p>The EOS 500D is not much use as it lacks the firmware and shoots everything at slow shutter speeds &#8211; bump up the ISO, and it just stops the lens down more! The Nikon D90, D5000 and D300S are all pretty useful as using A mode can force fast shutter speeds in video. Regular video producers do not like fast shutters, they think it makes action look jerky and prefer slight blur. I love video with fast shutter speeds.</p>
<p>Press shooters are often being trained up to shoot video clips, newspapers can syndicate to TV or use vids on their websites. But the majority of shots continue to be still frames. There are predictions (not mine) that one day, it will all be video, and all still frames will be extracted from even higher quality HD video than we have today.</p>
<p>If you want to analyse someone&#8217;s golf swing, 5fps is useless, 10fps is nearly useless, 24fps is acceptable, 30fps is good and 60fps is perfect. </p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plevyadophy</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/08/27/7fps-alpha-550/comment-page-1/#comment-1835</link>
		<dc:creator>plevyadophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1715#comment-1835</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir,

Thanks VERY much for the article, it really was an education. It really is interesting how many of us, myself included, hanker after this spec and that spec without really FULLY understanding what the benefits may or may not be. So now, thanks to you I am no longer that impressed by 9fps and 11fps cameras, nor will I feel short changed if my cam does 5fps and my pal&#039;s does 7fps.

You stated that: &quot;I’m not confirming anything (I have no more information than others), the article is intended as a general discussion of the value of higher fps rates and the big difference which HD video makes to catching the right moment – as the press is finding out mainly with the 5D MkII at 30fps and 1080p.&quot;

Sorry for being a bit dim but what do you mean exactly? What is the big difference that HD video makes to catching the moment? And what is it that the press are finding out with the 5D MkII?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

plevyadophy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,</p>
<p>Thanks VERY much for the article, it really was an education. It really is interesting how many of us, myself included, hanker after this spec and that spec without really FULLY understanding what the benefits may or may not be. So now, thanks to you I am no longer that impressed by 9fps and 11fps cameras, nor will I feel short changed if my cam does 5fps and my pal&#8217;s does 7fps.</p>
<p>You stated that: &#8220;I’m not confirming anything (I have no more information than others), the article is intended as a general discussion of the value of higher fps rates and the big difference which HD video makes to catching the right moment – as the press is finding out mainly with the 5D MkII at 30fps and 1080p.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry for being a bit dim but what do you mean exactly? What is the big difference that HD video makes to catching the moment? And what is it that the press are finding out with the 5D MkII?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>plevyadophy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/08/27/7fps-alpha-550/comment-page-1/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1715#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not confirming anything (I have no more information than others), the article is intended as a general discussion of the value of higher fps rates and the big difference which HD video makes to catching the right moment - as the press is finding out mainly with the 5D MkII at 30fps and 1080p.

The 5fps of the A700 is strictly limited to MANUAL focus (not even locked AF-S) and shutter speeds of 1/250th or shorter. Of course, it does C-AF during sequences, but you don&#039;t get 5fps. You get whatever it takes to maintain focus, and even that is not always guaranteed. One of the main problems with AF-C plus Hi sequence shooting is that if the focus accidentally shifts to a different plane (background) while following a subject, it thinks the focus is confirmed and you get a useless frame - it then has trouble getting back to the subject.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not confirming anything (I have no more information than others), the article is intended as a general discussion of the value of higher fps rates and the big difference which HD video makes to catching the right moment &#8211; as the press is finding out mainly with the 5D MkII at 30fps and 1080p.</p>
<p>The 5fps of the A700 is strictly limited to MANUAL focus (not even locked AF-S) and shutter speeds of 1/250th or shorter. Of course, it does C-AF during sequences, but you don&#8217;t get 5fps. You get whatever it takes to maintain focus, and even that is not always guaranteed. One of the main problems with AF-C plus Hi sequence shooting is that if the focus accidentally shifts to a different plane (background) while following a subject, it thinks the focus is confirmed and you get a useless frame &#8211; it then has trouble getting back to the subject.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike2008</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/08/27/7fps-alpha-550/comment-page-1/#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>mike2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1715#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article. There&#039;s seems to be a lot of conflicting ideas on this point though, for example the slow down in A700 fps in low light suggests some role of AE cycle each frame.  By the way are you confirming the 7 fps spec for the A550 or just assuming the rumours are right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article. There&#8217;s seems to be a lot of conflicting ideas on this point though, for example the slow down in A700 fps in low light suggests some role of AE cycle each frame.  By the way are you confirming the 7 fps spec for the A550 or just assuming the rumours are right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
