Alpha on Amazon

Subscribe to Cameracraft

Cameracraft is one of the highest quality photo enthusiast magazines you'll find - worldwide. Our Photoclubalpha subscription deal is £4.80 less (UK) than the current discounted offer - it's the lowest cost you can get. The cost will be held for three years and you can cancel at any time. Visit our web pages to see the regular deals, or subscribe below.

Postal Region

Photoclubalpha Forum

Join our free Forum for a wealth of info, great company and some fantastic photo sharing threads! Registration on the Forum is separate from Registration on the website, but you are allowed to register using the same name and password.
  • Private FS posts • asthma preventer inhaler brown April 8, 2020
    clomid available online buy cialis online in usa max weight loss in 40 days best online generic viagra canadian pharmacy no india generic cialis generic cialis forum weight loss doctors in ocala florida cialis online walmart cialis canadian pharmacy priceStatistics: Posted by Guest — Thu Apr 09, 2020 12:28 am
    guest
  • Private FS posts • buy cialis forum April 8, 2020
    sildenafil citrate tablets eregra 100 cvs pharmacy online store lose weight uae online viagra cheap get online prescription for viagra reviews viagra online generic cialis lilly best chinese diet pills that work fast buy cialis tadalafil 20mg buy generic cialis online canadaStatistics: Posted by Guest — Thu Apr 09, 2020 12:26 am
    guest
  • Private FS posts • cialis online uk April 8, 2020
    buy viagra with dapoxetine online sildenafil hypertension fiber diet fat loss indian online pharmacy where can i order generic viagra online can you order cialis online generic cialis bph mind games to help you lose weight cialis online fiable clomifen online bestellen ohne rezeptStatistics: Posted by Guest — Thu Apr 09, 2020 12:25 am
    guest
  • Private FS posts • london pharmacy online April 8, 2020
    order generic viagra online generic viagra цена how much african mango for weight loss best price cialis generic canadian drug pharmacy prices levitra online next day delivery generic cialis reduce fat of arms generic cialis us 2018 online pills viagraStatistics: Posted by Guest — Thu Apr 09, 2020 12:23 am
    guest
  • Private FS posts • read newspaper app April 8, 2020
    viagra cost online antibiotics for sale clicks will i lose weight if i drink a lot of green tea antibiotics buy antibiotics for uti asthma inhaler spacer lloyds tramadol online reduce belly fat without muscle tramadol canada viagra canada drugs reviewsStatistics: Posted by Guest — Thu Apr 09, 2020 12:22 am
    guest

Past Article Calendar

June 2016
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jul »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Is retouching acceptable?

There’s been a controversy surrounding Steve McCurry, a photographer I have listened to on the edge of a conversation a couple of times courtesy of Kodak who were always great sponsors and put his ‘Afghan Girl’ on display at photokina 2012 where McCurry’s work was celebrated.

Here’s the story – he’s been changing, or allowing his retouchers and agents to change, the material content of some shots. This has included the removal of people, changes to their clothing, tidying up messy objects and distractions. First, this is not something new and great photojournalists never saw harm in burning in or dodging back areas of a print to make something disappear into a shadow or burn out to white. It was OK to use bleach on prints if needed to remove blemishes, including things which damaged the shot. It was even OK to use tints or pencil to enhance outlines so that newspaper reproduction didn’t lose the subject in a grey mush.

//petapixel.com/2016/06/07/eyes-afghan-girl-critical-take-steve-mccurry-scandal/

That’s the current controversy.

Well, here are some examples from my archives. One dates from 1969 and back when the first prints were made from this, with publication in The Guardian and various magazines, I used pencil and bleach to try to ensure the faces at the centre of the group were properly defined from the wall behind them. This was a very mild treatment and not very successful.

Here’s a not-totally straight print. Some detailed dodging and burning was done in the darkroom to try to get the definition needed between the blonde girl’s face and the wall. It was this lack of definition which meant it was never a real winner, though it did well enough in competitions. It was also taken on outdated Perutz film using a very cheap manual Hanimex lens – I was only 17 and could not afford anything more!

Vintage 1969 black and white print scan secondary school pupils crowd round a little black girl who has fallen and is crying at Maltby Grammar School sports day. Note the black child was one of twins from the only coloured family in this Yorkshire mining town and at this time there was no discrimination just a lot of attention.

Once scanned, the print could be retouched digitally, Photoshop giving much more accurate control of burning-in the tone of the wall behind the girls. This is the result – it’s not a huge change. and I do not think anyone would suggest it falsifies the image.

Vintage 1969 black and white print scan secondary school pupils crowd round a little black girl who has fallen and is crying at Maltby Grammar School sports day. Note the black child was one of twins from the only coloured family in this Yorkshire mining town and at this time there was no discrimination just a lot of attention.

Moving on, here’s another group of children – three kids in the timed-burst water play fountain at Alnwick Castle Garden. It’s a picture I was very pleased to catch, the best of three frames with the children at the best critical moment for action and composition. But in the darkroom I would certainly have burned in the people in the background to reduce their distracting highlights.

Children run into a fountain released by build up of a head of water visible in a tube popular water feature in Alnwick Garden Northumberland UK

One of the principles of making a picture which works is to reduce it to a simple form. Extra faces always distract (we are drawn to look at faces regardless of composition). So, for this image, I retouched our the entire background scene. This would not be allowed by many competition, awards and some news or general media.

Children run into a fountain released by build up of a head of water visible in a tube popular water feature in Alnwick Garden Northumberland UK

Since I offer both images as licensable stock, with the retouched version clearly identified as retouched, I don’t feel there is any wrongdoing here.

The next example is less controversial because it has no people at all. Wires interfere with the view of Hollows Tower, the old stronghold of the reiver Johnny Armstrong in the debateable lands as you pass from Scotland into England.

Hollows, the tower house of the Armstrong clan lairds of Gilnockie on the border between England and Scotland. Unretouched see also version with power lines removed from shot.

It’s not a massive task to remove the pole and wire mess. It falsifies the state of the scene, but only from a viewpoint which is not typical – most tourists see the tower as they drive past, from many angles.

Hollows, the tower house of the Armstrong clan lairds of Gilnockie on the border between England and Scotland. Retouched image with power lines removed.

I have not removed all the poles!

Finally, another example of where the infrastructure spoils the scene. In Holetown, Barbados, local ladies tend to dress up well to do the shopping and tend to stop to chat in the street. Even so, it’s a matter of framing and shooting quickly to catch a neat moment before they move on or something else gets in the way. And the wiring on the wall really does spoil the shot.

Barbados Holetown St Thomas parish west coast two Bajan ladies typically dressed chat on a street corner

The retouching here was more complex. Is it a crime, or a routine part of modern photography?

Barbados Holetown St Thomas parish west coast two Bajan ladies typically dressed chat on a street corner retouched version

My work is generally used by travel guides, or in articles and books relating to people and places, travel and everyday life. The meter on the wall clearly documents the real place. The retouched image is an imaginary place. However it’s not been removed because it was an ugly meter. It’s removed because it spoiled a shot which I liked.

You can make your own judgments on Steve McCurry or his retouchers. Did they alter the pictures because they were really spoiled by the way they were? I feel I would have been happy with the unretouched image in most cases or used less obvious major changes.

– David Kilpatrick

 

1 comment to Is retouching acceptable?