<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Photoclub Alpha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photoclubalpha.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com</link>
	<description>Search this site - over 170 articles on Alpha system topics! Subscribe to our magazine too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:09:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A380 to ship with Silkypix? by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/06/07/a380-to-ship-with-silkypix/comment-page-1/#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1517#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>From some of the responses on Dyxum, I can&#039;t help wonder if Warehouseexpress might have put a Panasonic &#039;included&#039; box on the Sony data by mistake. Have to wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From some of the responses on Dyxum, I can&#8217;t help wonder if Warehouseexpress might have put a Panasonic &#8216;included&#8217; box on the Sony data by mistake. Have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A380 to ship with Silkypix? by alphaomega</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/06/07/a380-to-ship-with-silkypix/comment-page-1/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>alphaomega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1517#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Interesting development. I have Panasonic&#039;s LX2 &amp; LX3 compact cameras. Both have RAW and are supplied with Silkypix SE for these cameras only. I believe that all Panasonic DSLRs also are supplied with a version of Silkypix. Generally I would say this software is better than IDC but the English is appalling. You scratch your head to figure out what is what. The LX2/3 can be pretty bad for CR at wide angles but Silkypix generally handles removal well although it can be a bit fiddly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting development. I have Panasonic&#8217;s LX2 &amp; LX3 compact cameras. Both have RAW and are supplied with Silkypix SE for these cameras only. I believe that all Panasonic DSLRs also are supplied with a version of Silkypix. Generally I would say this software is better than IDC but the English is appalling. You scratch your head to figure out what is what. The LX2/3 can be pretty bad for CR at wide angles but Silkypix generally handles removal well although it can be a bit fiddly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Sony Alpha 500 and 550 leaked by toughluck</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/25/new-sony-alpha-500-and-550-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>toughluck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/25/new-sony-alpha-500-and-550-leaked/#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>This 10-24 is likely just a copy of the Tamron, so this isn&#039;t really fortunate. However, maybe Sony will cherrypick this stock to serve only the best to Alpha users.

A full frame version of the A700 is probably coming, but I doubt it will happen this year. If anything, a full frame A700 is probably going to be called A800. So A730 (or anything in that vein) is probably going to be APS-c with higher resolution and main sensor Live View.

As for the leaks, F40AM is a misspell of F20AM. The people updating the website have next to no knowledge of DSLRs. (KM Canada dissolved a year before Sony took over KM DSLRs, key people dispersed and Sony was unable to recruit them.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This 10-24 is likely just a copy of the Tamron, so this isn&#8217;t really fortunate. However, maybe Sony will cherrypick this stock to serve only the best to Alpha users.</p>
<p>A full frame version of the A700 is probably coming, but I doubt it will happen this year. If anything, a full frame A700 is probably going to be called A800. So A730 (or anything in that vein) is probably going to be APS-c with higher resolution and main sensor Live View.</p>
<p>As for the leaks, F40AM is a misspell of F20AM. The people updating the website have next to no knowledge of DSLRs. (KM Canada dissolved a year before Sony took over KM DSLRs, key people dispersed and Sony was unable to recruit them.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Studio light-table technique by Studio light table technique Photoclub Alpha &#124; Wood TV Stand</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2007/06/15/studio-light-table-technique/comment-page-1/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Studio light table technique Photoclub Alpha &#124; Wood TV Stand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 23:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoclubalpha.com/?p=123#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>[...] Studio light table technique Photoclub Alpha   Posted by root 2 hours 4 minutes ago (http://photoclubalpha.com)        Jun 15 2007 digital studio lights tracking lumina massive studio stand used to keep the lumina rock solid and so on our current table is a tre d which has a 75 x 150cm acrylic sheet leave a comment you must be logged in to post a comment powered by wordpr        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Studio light table technique Photoclub Alpha [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Studio light table technique Photoclub Alpha   Posted by root 2 hours 4 minutes ago (<a href="http://photoclubalpha.com" rel="nofollow">http://photoclubalpha.com</a>)        Jun 15 2007 digital studio lights tracking lumina massive studio stand used to keep the lumina rock solid and so on our current table is a tre d which has a 75 x 150cm acrylic sheet leave a comment you must be logged in to post a comment powered by wordpr        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Studio light table technique Photoclub Alpha [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Sony Alpha 500 and 550 leaked by tfd</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/25/new-sony-alpha-500-and-550-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-1739</link>
		<dc:creator>tfd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/25/new-sony-alpha-500-and-550-leaked/#comment-1739</guid>
		<description>All I really want is a full-frame upgrade to the A700, maybe with the new back-lit sensor, and even faster auto-focus and burst rate.  Don&#039;t need 25 MP (files are too big, and I don&#039;t make billboards) or video.  Basically a Sony competitor/upgrade to the Nikon D700.  Any chance of that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I really want is a full-frame upgrade to the A700, maybe with the new back-lit sensor, and even faster auto-focus and burst rate.  Don&#8217;t need 25 MP (files are too big, and I don&#8217;t make billboards) or video.  Basically a Sony competitor/upgrade to the Nikon D700.  Any chance of that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Sony Alpha 500 and 550 leaked by alexramos</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/25/new-sony-alpha-500-and-550-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-1736</link>
		<dc:creator>alexramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/25/new-sony-alpha-500-and-550-leaked/#comment-1736</guid>
		<description>The design must be new, maybe a230/a330/a380 style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The design must be new, maybe a230/a330/a380 style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Sony Alpha 500 and 550 leaked by richardharris</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/25/new-sony-alpha-500-and-550-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-1735</link>
		<dc:creator>richardharris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/25/new-sony-alpha-500-and-550-leaked/#comment-1735</guid>
		<description>I think these could be intersting cameras. The 5 series has traditionally been quite popular with a number of different people, with greatly varying skill level. My only hope is that the 10-24 is not a straight copy of the Tamron. Sony needs something high quality for super wide APS-C users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these could be intersting cameras. The 5 series has traditionally been quite popular with a number of different people, with greatly varying skill level. My only hope is that the 10-24 is not a straight copy of the Tamron. Sony needs something high quality for super wide APS-C users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New skins versus old wine &#8211; A350 or A380? by Hobbitofny</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/18/new-skins-versus-old-wine-a350-or-a380/comment-page-1/#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobbitofny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1483#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>With a smaller battery, I assume the grip will not work on these models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a smaller battery, I assume the grip will not work on these models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New skins versus old wine &#8211; A350 or A380? by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/18/new-skins-versus-old-wine-a350-or-a380/comment-page-1/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1483#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>You can get 32GB SD not sure about MS. 16GB is more common. They are affordable too. The card format is no big deal now but I prefer to have one card type and one reliable FireWire reader for fast transfer, and CF does that for me. I&#039;m always losing SD and MS cards.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get 32GB SD not sure about MS. 16GB is more common. They are affordable too. The card format is no big deal now but I prefer to have one card type and one reliable FireWire reader for fast transfer, and CF does that for me. I&#8217;m always losing SD and MS cards.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New skins versus old wine &#8211; A350 or A380? by Hobbitofny</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/18/new-skins-versus-old-wine-a350-or-a380/comment-page-1/#comment-1726</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobbitofny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1483#comment-1726</guid>
		<description>I have been using 32GB cards in the 350. For me, even a 8GB card were simply to small shooting RAW and Jpeg with this camera. 

How big are sd cards? I have not used any in years. A380 shoot the same size files as the 350 right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using 32GB cards in the 350. For me, even a 8GB card were simply to small shooting RAW and Jpeg with this camera. </p>
<p>How big are sd cards? I have not used any in years. A380 shoot the same size files as the 350 right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony Alpha 230, 330 and 380 update by MrCynical</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/16/new-alphas-have-hdmi-output/comment-page-1/#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>MrCynical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1442#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>Have Sony taken leave of their senses? They&#039;ve sacrificed their main consumer attraction vs Canikon (ie lower price for equivalent models) without doing anything to address their main weakness (higher high-ISO noise than equivalent models). I was really hoping these new Alphas would be something special...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have Sony taken leave of their senses? They&#8217;ve sacrificed their main consumer attraction vs Canikon (ie lower price for equivalent models) without doing anything to address their main weakness (higher high-ISO noise than equivalent models). I was really hoping these new Alphas would be something special&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony Alpha 230, 330 and 380 update by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/16/new-alphas-have-hdmi-output/comment-page-1/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 22:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1442#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>I have added something to the article - it occurs to me that Sony already made SD/MS dual drives (as used in the Minolta G600) with the ability to copy between drives. I don&#039;t think there is room for a CF/MS Pro dual slot in the camera base, if it is indeed there - but there would be room for a dual SD/MS Pro drive.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have added something to the article &#8211; it occurs to me that Sony already made SD/MS dual drives (as used in the Minolta G600) with the ability to copy between drives. I don&#8217;t think there is room for a CF/MS Pro dual slot in the camera base, if it is indeed there &#8211; but there would be room for a dual SD/MS Pro drive.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony Alpha 230, 330 and 380 update by AllanMarcus</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/16/new-alphas-have-hdmi-output/comment-page-1/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>AllanMarcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1442#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>Ug. A move to &quot;Memory Stick&quot; would be horrible for the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ug. A move to &#8220;Memory Stick&#8221; would be horrible for the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony Alpha 230, 330 and 380 update by LEdgars</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/16/new-alphas-have-hdmi-output/comment-page-1/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>LEdgars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 11:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1442#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>In new cameras should be new sensors. Is something known about them? I wondering if they are back-illuminated or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In new cameras should be new sensors. Is something known about them? I wondering if they are back-illuminated or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alpha 330 &#8211; future model? by PhotoDelusions</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/02/alpha-330-future-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>PhotoDelusions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1421#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>As is being commented elsewhere, a Russian website apparently gives more detail:

http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http://www.sony.ru/hub/dslr/block/2/subblock/1&amp;sl=ru&amp;tl=en&amp;history_state0=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As is being commented elsewhere, a Russian website apparently gives more detail:</p>
<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http://www.sony.ru/hub/dslr/block/2/subblock/1&amp;sl=ru&amp;tl=en&amp;history_state0=" rel="nofollow">http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http://www.sony.ru/hub/dslr/block/2/subblock/1&amp;sl=ru&amp;tl=en&amp;history_state0=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alpha 330 &#8211; future model? by alexramos</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/02/alpha-330-future-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1712</link>
		<dc:creator>alexramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1421#comment-1712</guid>
		<description>http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;productId=11040963

&quot;This product is no longer available for purchase.&quot;

Ya esta descatalogado de SonyStyle USA...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;productId=11040963" rel="nofollow">http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;productId=11040963</a></p>
<p>&#8220;This product is no longer available for purchase.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ya esta descatalogado de SonyStyle USA&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alpha 330 &#8211; future model? by alexramos</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/02/alpha-330-future-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator>alexramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1421#comment-1710</guid>
		<description>SonyStyle USA has a very good offer to a350...

http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;productId=8198552921665848057

a350 + grip + 18-70mm + 55-200mm = $799 (sold out)

Also, the a200 and a300 have interesting offers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SonyStyle USA has a very good offer to a350&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;productId=8198552921665848057" rel="nofollow">http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;productId=8198552921665848057</a></p>
<p>a350 + grip + 18-70mm + 55-200mm = $799 (sold out)</p>
<p>Also, the a200 and a300 have interesting offers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alpha 330 &#8211; future model? by toughluck</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/02/alpha-330-future-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>toughluck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1421#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>The lenses (50/1.8, 30/2.8 and 28-75/2.8) have the distance scale coupled to the focus ring, meaning it rotates. So no ring ultrasonic motor, but a cheaper and smaller micro-USM. Unfortunately, this means that focusing is going to be slower and draw more power, while being just as loud as it was.
All new lenses are going to have motors, of course.

As for the new kits, the A330L (L is next in sequence after K) is obviously a standard kit with 18-55, while the Y is a double kit with 18-55 and 55-200 (again, Y is next in sequence after X).

The kit with 18-200 was denoted with H, so it&#039;s logical to assume that a kit with 18-250 (if any of the new alphas is going to feature movies) is going to be denoted with G. Suppose there are new 16-105 and 16-80 with motors released (the lenses seem to have a lot of space inside for a ring motor), new kits are likely going to be called Q and maybe C (no letter after Z).

Maybe Sony will try and release a double kit with 70-300 and 16-105 or 16-80?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lenses (50/1.8, 30/2.8 and 28-75/2.8) have the distance scale coupled to the focus ring, meaning it rotates. So no ring ultrasonic motor, but a cheaper and smaller micro-USM. Unfortunately, this means that focusing is going to be slower and draw more power, while being just as loud as it was.<br />
All new lenses are going to have motors, of course.</p>
<p>As for the new kits, the A330L (L is next in sequence after K) is obviously a standard kit with 18-55, while the Y is a double kit with 18-55 and 55-200 (again, Y is next in sequence after X).</p>
<p>The kit with 18-200 was denoted with H, so it&#8217;s logical to assume that a kit with 18-250 (if any of the new alphas is going to feature movies) is going to be denoted with G. Suppose there are new 16-105 and 16-80 with motors released (the lenses seem to have a lot of space inside for a ring motor), new kits are likely going to be called Q and maybe C (no letter after Z).</p>
<p>Maybe Sony will try and release a double kit with 70-300 and 16-105 or 16-80?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alpha 330 &#8211; future model? by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/02/alpha-330-future-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 21:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1421#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>SSM is like Nikon Silent Wave. Not all AF-S lenses are Silent Wave, and Sony may introduce something a level below SSM. Or they may including exactly the same technology as exists. But the new lenses are extremely small.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SSM is like Nikon Silent Wave. Not all AF-S lenses are Silent Wave, and Sony may introduce something a level below SSM. Or they may including exactly the same technology as exists. But the new lenses are extremely small.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alpha 330 &#8211; future model? by alexramos</title>
		<link>http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2009/05/02/alpha-330-future-model/comment-page-1/#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>alexramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 18:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photoclubalpha.com/?p=1421#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>&quot;There is a possibility that these budget lenses are not SSM, but use a cheaper internal micromotor.&quot;

Why...??

I think the Nikon entry level lenses uses ring motor and them are cheper, I think Sony could be same...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is a possibility that these budget lenses are not SSM, but use a cheaper internal micromotor.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why&#8230;??</p>
<p>I think the Nikon entry level lenses uses ring motor and them are cheper, I think Sony could be same&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
