Rumours, rumours, rumours are they valid??

Discussion of all digital SLR cameras under the Minolta and Konica Minolta brands
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Winedarksea
Heirophant
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:53 am

Re: Rumours, rumours, rumours are they valid??

Unread post by Winedarksea »

David Kilpatrick wrote:We have not yet seen how this camera operates. It is more than possible it contains the reverse pellicle mirror system - a simple enough 60/40 semisilvered mirror, which allows plenty of light through to the sensor for live composition and viewing, or video, while diverting a fair amount to a phase detect AF array. Sony's mockups which appeared to have just the sensor visible may have omitted a mirror system, in order to sidetrack the opposition.

Such a mirror could be a fixed pellicle, which would also seal the sensor against dust, or a moving one to allow full light transmission to the sensor if desired.

David
Would it be possible, so you think, David, to electronically turn the reflectivity of a "pellicle" on and off, without moving it, and thus use 100% of the light for both main sensor and af sensor?
Alpha 700, SAL 50 f1.4, SAL 18-250, SAL 85 f1.4 ZA
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Rumours, rumours, rumours are they valid??

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

If that was possible - which it is in another application, digital projectors - they would make shutters out of such a system. I think the reflective angle can be changed, but not the transparent aspect.

David
OneGuyKs

Re: Rumours, rumours, rumours are they valid??

Unread post by OneGuyKs »

The camera is too thin and small for pellicle mirror and AF sensor. That would probably be in A7xx size camera but not these models.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests