http://www.photoclubalpha.com/2010/09/2 ... o-in-full/
Up now
David
Photokina 2010 video
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6117
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Photokina 2010 video
I suppose the only recourse is too have two NEX's when at an important event in case of overheating. I haven't had time too watch it yet, was there much of the A7xx onnouncement missed?
Greg
Greg
Re: Photokina 2010 video
Thank you and I have gone through them repeatedly.
- bfitzgerald
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 3996
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:48 pm
Re: Photokina 2010 video
Translucent Cat fish? Did I hear that right? lol
Well as far as NEX goes and being open to other makers, making improvements to the interface via firmware, I'd have to say that is good news for those who use that. Even if NEX isn't appealing to me it might be at some point if they can look at weaker areas.
As for the DSLR side I've seen that before so it's the same message, translucent and no real mention of normal DSLR's.
So I'm still of the view I was before if you want translucent or are ok with that you'll be happy. If you are a more traditional OVF DSLR user, now is a very good time to make an exit plan.
Well as far as NEX goes and being open to other makers, making improvements to the interface via firmware, I'd have to say that is good news for those who use that. Even if NEX isn't appealing to me it might be at some point if they can look at weaker areas.
As for the DSLR side I've seen that before so it's the same message, translucent and no real mention of normal DSLR's.
So I'm still of the view I was before if you want translucent or are ok with that you'll be happy. If you are a more traditional OVF DSLR user, now is a very good time to make an exit plan.
- Dr. Harout
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5662
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
- Location: Yerevan, Armenia
- Contact:
Re: Photokina 2010 video
In the third movie synchronization of the sound was not right...
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Photokina 2010 video
The sound is part of the file and no sound editing was done, so I am not sure how that happened for you - it seems OK to me!
David
David
- Dr. Harout
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5662
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
- Location: Yerevan, Armenia
- Contact:
Re: Photokina 2010 video
OK, I'll try to look at it again after clearing entirely the cache.
Re: Photokina 2010 video
Thanks David for putting this up!
Just saw it and feel the same - picture comes 1 sec after sound. You can still see the speakers mouth moving when the sound has already stopped!Dr. Harout wrote:In the third movie synchronization of the sound was not right...
- UrsaMajor
- Imperial Ambassador
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:36 am
- Location: Southern California
Re: Photokina 2010 video
I encountered a similar experience, although my impression was that the lag was nowhere near a full second. I was watching it at lunch time on the computer at work, using Firefox. When I get home tonight, I'll see how it looks on Opera, just in case it has something to do with the browser in use.bossel wrote:Just saw it and feel the same - picture comes 1 sec after sound. You can still see the speakers mouth moving when the sound has already stopped!Dr. Harout wrote:In the third movie synchronization of the sound was not right...
With best wishes,
- Tom -
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Photokina 2010 video
I don't know why, but I think it is buffering the video and sound at different rates. My Mac shows the video stopping completely but the sound keeps on - then the video catches up, and sometimes lags behind. It seems to be YouTube not the original. I have checked the original file, the one sent to YouTube, and it is perfect - exact sync.
David
David
- pakodominguez
- Minister with Portfolio
- Posts: 2306
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
Re: Photokina 2010 video
at what resolution?David Kilpatrick wrote:I don't know why, but I think it is buffering the video and sound at different rates. My Mac shows the video stopping completely but the sound keeps on - then the video catches up, and sometimes lags behind. It seems to be YouTube not the original. I have checked the original file, the one sent to YouTube, and it is perfect - exact sync.
David
if 720p, it is probably a video card not strong enough (plus internet connection speed, buffering, RAM, etc...)
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Photokina 2010 video
Don't think it's a video card issue, I can play high bitrate full 1080p with never a single problem but even the 320 resolution version from YouTube has this lag - occsasionally. Server load, connection, I think.
David
David
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests