David Kilpatrick wrote:...replaced by the D700 this morning...
David Kilpatrick wrote:I'm testing both of them this week - the 1000D has just gone back, replaced by the D700 this morning. If anyone wants any info or comments in due course, just ask. I will not post a review of these cameras on photoclubalpha, both articles will appear in the British Journal.
01af wrote: Dr. Harout, you won't get back to Nikon? So you used to have Nikon? What didn't you like specifically? -- Olaf
David Kilpatrick wrote:... I notice the previous user (Nikon staff probably) has set it to centre spot, not the 51-zone wide area.
01af wrote:David, didn't your son Richard switch to Nikon recently? Does he miss an in-body stabilizer? What about focus accuracy? Is he happy with his choice, or does he have any regrets? Do NEF files process neatly with non-Nikon raw converters, namely Camera Raw? I keep hearing about problems here ...
Philip wrote:David, you wrote in the Feb/March editon of F2, when comparing the Oly E-3 and Nkn D3, that what you would like would be a D3 sensor in a D300 body. Nkn have now delivered exactly this in the D700 (we assume), and I am very tempted to switch after 25 years of Minolta use (despite a huge investment in glass), so am really looking forward to yor insights. What are your initial thoughts on quality - image and build, and have Nkn crippled the high ISO function to protect D3 sales?
David Kilpatrick wrote:The D3 has been out of stock and over-ordered for months. The D700, if it doesn't go 'unobtainable' within days of launch, will actually fill a gap. There are not enough D3s to go round.
Just wait for the A900. It will cost as much as a D700, guaranteed - Sony is not going to be cutting prices for a sensor like that. You are looking at some amazingly good, and expensive, Sony DSLR gear to be seen at photokina. And they will not be able to meet the demand, the A900 will be back ordered for six months after it actually reaches the shops.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests