Resizing Images

Link to your work for constructive help, criticism or advice from the Photoclubalpha community
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
gaz_daf
Acolyte
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Coventry England

Resizing Images

Unread post by gaz_daf »

How do I resize my images & send them to Photclubalpha please and what's the best size to send? :? :?:
Gaz
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

If you are talking about the Gallery, you should resize the images using any normal method (best is probably Bicubic Sharper in Photoshop, or just the default resizing in Elements, PSP etc) to 600 pixels on their longest dimension. Gallery incorporates an upload function and it will resize anything too large for you, but to save bandwidth it's best to do that first.

If you want to submit exceptional images for consideration in our printed magazine, you should first make a Gallery here, and send me an email asking me to look at the images in a small size. If we feel we can include a picture in our open gallery pages of the magazine, I will ask you for a highe resolution file to be sent directly to me. If you are not already a magazine subscriber, a subscription will be given for any image/s used (sometimes, we use a pair of shots together from one photographer to make a comparative point).

David
Last edited by David Kilpatrick on Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gagauza
Acolyte
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: Romania, Bucharest

Unread post by Gagauza »

ok i've tried resizeing in more ways and i want to ask u david witch one of this two pictures would u think is best resize?!
http://bp1.blogger.com/_5iCL00nd3Io/Rp ... +try.jpg

http://bp1.blogger.com/_5iCL00nd3Io/Rp ... orata.jpg

because first is resize with bicubic best and the second with bilinear and i don't know what to think because it seems to me that the second one is better......

P.S. I hope i am allowed to post here the links if not sorry about it....
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

I'd say the first is better for robustness of detail - bilinear may look slightly finer, but it tends to give the image a slightly 'shifted detail' look, as if seen through a grating. Either would do fine for Gallery purposes. You really don't need to worry that much, a good picture is what counts most.

David
User avatar
Pirate
Oligarch
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK
Contact:

Faststone Resizer

Unread post by Pirate »

Not sure if this helps, but I use it A LOT.

http://www.faststone.org/FSResizerDetail.htm
lugnut
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:24 pm

Re: Faststone Resizer

Unread post by lugnut »

Pirate wrote:Not sure if this helps, but I use it A LOT.

http://www.faststone.org/FSResizerDetail.htm

I use that one too... very simple and easy to use.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests