Photos with evidence of the photographer

Dr. Harout · Unread post by **Dr. Harout** » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:31 pm

yes, the one with the shorts.

Juanito200 · Unread post by **Juanito200** » Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:53 pm

Tom I just changed the viewing angle of the screen, and I could see you no problem. Well done.

Gio67's photo inspired me to make my latest entry. Unfortunately I had nothing as cool as the Trevi fountain for a background, so I thought how much evidence could I pack into one photo... I believe I have 1st, 2nd, and 3rd order of evidence. Let me know what you think, John.

Please excuse the flare and the smudges on my sunglasses. It was a hot and sunny day on the beach. John

aster · Unread post by **aster** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:19 am

John, you doubled the evidences in there; face and the reflection of the hands.... : ) Good approach!

An other reflective surface in the scene and the evidence could be tripled....

Yildiz

bakubo · Unread post by **bakubo** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:33 am

aster wrote:John, you doubled the evidences in there; face and the reflection of the hands.... : ) Good approach!

An other reflective surface in the scene and the evidence could be tripled....

Yildiz, you missed the third evidence. The reflection of the shadow!

aster · Unread post by **aster** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:12 am

bakubo wrote:
aster wrote:John, you doubled the evidences in there; face and the reflection of the hands.... : ) Good approach!

An other reflective surface in the scene and the evidence could be tripled....
Yildiz, you missed the third evidence. The reflection of the shadow!

Ah! Indeed! How right you are, Henry!

Yildiz

Birma · Unread post by **Birma** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:03 am

Very clever shot John - love it !

Now, if we could have a similar one while your were para-gliding .....

Dr. Harout · Unread post by **Dr. Harout** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:44 pm

Birma wrote:Very clever shot John - love it !

Now, if we could have a similar one while your were para-gliding .....

... and while the camera drops...

Juanito200 · Unread post by **Juanito200** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:15 pm

No photos from me while parasailing. I considered it, but the risk was too great... Ian got one as I was leaving the boat on the parachute, and Dannelle got a couple of me in the air, as well as the kids... We are about to leave now, I'll try to post them tomorrow. John

Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:22 pm

Walking home with the NEX-5 and 18-55mm tonight:

: longshadow.jpg (248.77 KiB) Viewed 53019 times

not even the 16mm. Raw processed in IDC.
David

Birma · Unread post by **Birma** » Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:32 pm

There is a spooky element with your shadow falling across the gravestone

.

A difference with this shot is that it is (probably?) the only one where the photographer does not have the camera to their eye.

Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:39 am

Yes, I walked until the shadow was placed right. The head and shoulder areas has a sort of green glow too at full size, from the penumbral light reflected off the grass. Also, using the LCD screen to compose greatly improves the chance of 'seeing' a picture like this properly; it just seemed more graphic then normal.

Actually I'd like an even larger, higher resolution screen to compose on!

David

Juanito200 · Unread post by **Juanito200** » Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:42 am

Very striking DK!!

aster · Unread post by **aster** » Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:44 am

Good one...yet a spooky one, David.

Good timing with the daylight.

Yildiz

Dr. Harout · Unread post by **Dr. Harout** » Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:20 am

The grass is discernible under your shadow, is it a PP or the sensor having a wider sensibility zone?

harveyzone · Unread post by **harveyzone** » Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:58 am

Blimey David, what long legs you have got

It seemed to me that every photo I took when I first had my fisheye, especially upright format, had my feet on! I've just had a look through some old shots but cannot find any now. I have either deleted them or cropped them off.

Photoclubalpha

Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Re: Photos with evidence of the photographer

Who is online