As mentioned previously my friend and I went to Lick Observatory on July 2, 2019 (New Moon day or around it).
We stopped at a spot a Lick Observatory Volunteer suggested. Though much to learn, I managed to few half decent
shots. IMnotsoHO.
Any/all feedback is much welcomed and appreciated.
I even tried a Panorama in that darkness
Milky Way
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Re: Milky Way
.
Well, you certainly should be proud, Sury.
They indeed are good shots of the Milky Way. Quite an impressive amount of comets or airplanes out there as well. Lots of action going on that we mostly miss because of city lights, unfortunately. To think that we could easily see the Milky Way every dark night and enjoy like ancient times is beautiful.
Thanks for sharing,
Yildiz
Well, you certainly should be proud, Sury.
They indeed are good shots of the Milky Way. Quite an impressive amount of comets or airplanes out there as well. Lots of action going on that we mostly miss because of city lights, unfortunately. To think that we could easily see the Milky Way every dark night and enjoy like ancient times is beautiful.
Thanks for sharing,
Yildiz
Re: Milky Way
Sury
Impressive
Ossie
Impressive
Ossie
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Milky Way
Yildiz,
Thank you very much. Unfortunately, they are all planes.
Ossie, thank you.
With best regards,
Sury
Thank you very much. Unfortunately, they are all planes.
Ossie, thank you.
With best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
-
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:50 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
- Contact:
Re: Milky Way
An excellent start. I see some hints of post production (maybe). What lens?
Most important, what do you think of the shots and what do you do next?
Most important, what do you think of the shots and what do you do next?
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Milky Way
JT,
Thank you. Yes, there is post production, the usual clarity, blacks, whites, contrast and exposure.
Given my previous attempts, I am quite happy with the results though not fully satisfied.
I used CZ24-70f2.8 and CZ24f2 prime.
As for next steps, travel to an area that has better dark sky, like Sierra Nevada Mountains (Eastern California),
and try a Tamron 15-30 or CZ16-35 or a UWA prime lens. Though most sites I researched recommended 1.8 or faster,
I am convinced wider angle is preferred over speed of the lens. We (my friend on a Canon 5DMIV) have been shooting
at less than 20 sec around 1000 iso without star trails. So speed of the lens could be an additive rather than a subtractive element.
Here is an example of CZ24f2 at f2 and 15sec exposre and iso 400. You can see the faint traces of Milkyway. Perhaps I could have gone to 3200 iso and obtained a better definition. At 24mm, I am looking at 20sec max exposure without star trails (500/fl rule).
Thank you. Yes, there is post production, the usual clarity, blacks, whites, contrast and exposure.
Given my previous attempts, I am quite happy with the results though not fully satisfied.
I used CZ24-70f2.8 and CZ24f2 prime.
As for next steps, travel to an area that has better dark sky, like Sierra Nevada Mountains (Eastern California),
and try a Tamron 15-30 or CZ16-35 or a UWA prime lens. Though most sites I researched recommended 1.8 or faster,
I am convinced wider angle is preferred over speed of the lens. We (my friend on a Canon 5DMIV) have been shooting
at less than 20 sec around 1000 iso without star trails. So speed of the lens could be an additive rather than a subtractive element.
Here is an example of CZ24f2 at f2 and 15sec exposre and iso 400. You can see the faint traces of Milkyway. Perhaps I could have gone to 3200 iso and obtained a better definition. At 24mm, I am looking at 20sec max exposure without star trails (500/fl rule).
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
-
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:50 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
- Contact:
Re: Milky Way
Good stuff Sury. Your comments track with what I understood to be the best way to capture these types of images. Composition always matters and for me it seems that focal length depends on how much sky you want to show versus foreground. The 20 second rule worked for me so I would adjust iso to get there. Lastly, I focused my post production efforts on the parts of the sky that I wanted to accentuate.That would minimize that rim of light that you see at the transition between land and sky.
All the best.
JT
RX1 35mm f2.0 iso 1600 @20 seconds.
All the best.
JT
RX1 35mm f2.0 iso 1600 @20 seconds.
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Milky Way
JT,
Nice one. Thanks for the suggestion on accentuating the interesting part of the sky. I was doing LR tweaks.
Perhaps I should try a couple on PS.
Sury
Nice one. Thanks for the suggestion on accentuating the interesting part of the sky. I was doing LR tweaks.
Perhaps I should try a couple on PS.
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
-
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:50 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
- Contact:
Re: Milky Way
You can "dodge and burn" in Lightroom.
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Milky Way
I haven't figured out how to do it in a small area.
I have been applying graduated filters and I am able to do it either length wise or breadth wise.
Sury
I have been applying graduated filters and I am able to do it either length wise or breadth wise.
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
-
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:50 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
- Contact:
Re: Milky Way
Brush tool with clarity and contrast.
JT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60jVSCdU_s4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVIBHhsSsdE
JT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60jVSCdU_s4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVIBHhsSsdE
Re: Milky Way
.
Thank you for the links, JBTaylor.
I learned a couple of things from these video tutorials myself as well.
Yildiz
Thank you for the links, JBTaylor.
I learned a couple of things from these video tutorials myself as well.
Yildiz
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Milky Way
JT,jbtaylor wrote:Brush tool with clarity and contrast.
JT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60jVSCdU_s4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVIBHhsSsdE
Thank you for the links. I applied some suggestions in the first video to my friend's image with better results. I haven't applied it to my images yet.
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
-
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:50 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
- Contact:
Re: Milky Way
YouTube rules.
JT
JT
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests