100mm Macro: object of desire

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by pakodominguez »

A700 + 5600 on wireless hand helded ISO 200
no photoshop at all:
1/60 f9
Image
100% crop
Image
1/100 f11
Image
100% crop
Image
1/60 f13
Image

nice, isn't it?
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
jcoffin
Grand Caliph
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by jcoffin »

pakodominguez wrote:A700 + 5600 on wireless hand helded ISO 200
no photoshop at all:

[ ... photos elided ]

nice, isn't it?
Very nice indeed! The first red flowers are almost unbelievably saturated, while the second white with a purple spiral is very subtle and restrained -- and both exquisitely sharp and detailed. You could hardly ask for better!
User avatar
KevinBarrett
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by KevinBarrett »

I have seriously considered this lens for if and when I get into macro photography. I wonder how it compares to the Tamron 90mm macro?
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by pakodominguez »

KevinBarrett wrote:I have seriously considered this lens for if and when I get into macro photography. I wonder how it compares to the Tamron 90mm macro?
No Idea. I bought my expensive Minolta lenses when nobody gave a dam for them -I paid about $300 for the 100 Macro at the Adorama Used Department (it's the old one, cosmetics are just OK, but optics Rocks) the only minus is the slow and hunting focus, but I understand the Tamron isn't better in that regard.
I have a couple of portraits of my girlfriend with this lens wide open and it's still too sharp! But for portraits I have another gem, the 100 2.8 SF (David owe us a test of this lens on the A900)

Regards
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
KevinBarrett
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2449
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by KevinBarrett »

That's more or less what I've heard about the Tamron, that it is so sharp it needs to be defocused for portraits. I saw one of those 100mm SF lenses for sale very recently and can't remember where now...drat!
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Oh, the 100/2.8 is on my wish list.
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6117
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Very nice Pako, it's a pleasure to use a lens where you don't have to work hard too get a really nice photo, don't you think?

The KM or Sony 100 f2.8 Macro is a lovely lens, the focus is noticeably slow only when the lens has too rack the front element out towards 1:1 for some serious macro work, but for just general closeup type shots where there isn't much racking involved I find it quite ok on my A100 and by all accounts it's supposed to be quite a bit slower than the A700, and I honestly have never really noticed the focus missing and hunting, well it may have done so, but not so much on a regular basis that I made some mental note of it...I think the best way too help would be to try to keep the movements of oneself and camera to a minimum while the camera is focussing. (zero is best of course, but requires a tripod).
Greg

ps. You deserve to have one Doc.
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Greg Beetham wrote:ps. You deserve to have one Doc.
Thanks Greg. :D
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
BigRich
Acolyte
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:41 am

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by BigRich »

I have had my 100 macro since the Minolta days, and it is by far my favorite lens. Really wonderful. Enjoy!

Rich
TallPaul
Acolyte
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:30 am

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by TallPaul »

Good deal on the 100mm Macro at A J Purdy at the moment, or at least there was last night...
sparaxis
Initiate
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:30 pm
Location: Baltimore USA

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by sparaxis »

Truly a wonderful lens,

Focus is slow, but the lens is very sharp even at full aperture. Bokeh is nice too.

I bought mine as a short tele instead of the way too expensive Zeiss 85 mm.

I was able to buy a new KM one from B&H for around $100 less than the then new Sony one. No regrets.

(Well, that is not quite true...I love 100 mm on film, but it is too darn long for what I want on my A700. I guess I need that A900 after all)

Alan
jcoffin
Grand Caliph
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by jcoffin »

sparaxis wrote:...I love 100 mm on film, but it is too darn long for what I want on my A700. I guess I need that A900 after all)

Alan
Perhaps I could get you to talk to my fiance about exactly why I also need an A900. :D :lol:
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

jcoffin wrote:Perhaps I could get you to talk to my fiance about exactly why I also need an A900. :D :lol:
Would a prescription help? :lol:
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
Matt_Atkinson
Acolyte
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:51 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by Matt_Atkinson »

I love my Sony 100mm Macro. I've heard lots of people criticize the slow AF, but even on my A100 I find it ok - it's not as quick as the 50mm f1.4 by a long shot, but fast enough for me (certainly faster than my 18-200, which is about as slow as I'd wanna go!). AF isn't much use in macro or lowlight work anyway I find, which is mostly what I use it for.
Little things like the non-rotating focus ring are nice to have too.
jcoffin
Grand Caliph
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA

Re: 100mm Macro: object of desire

Unread post by jcoffin »

Dr. Harout wrote:
jcoffin wrote:Perhaps I could get you to talk to my fiance about exactly why I also need an A900. :D :lol:
Would a prescription help? :lol:
Hmm..."New camera. Take one annually to prevent photographic doldrums..." :D
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests