Bring Back the Classics

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
KevinBarrett
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2562
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Contact:

Bring Back the Classics

Unread postby KevinBarrett » Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:45 am

What classic Minolta lenses (AF or MF) would you like Sony to bring into the present Alpha family?

I was daydreaming the other day about a 70-210/4 with Sony's SSM, a focus limiting switch, better flare resistance, and a non-rotating front element. A Beercan MkII, if you will; faster than a 70-300 G and less expensive than a 70-200/2.8, what a beautiful compromise it would be!

Also, a 58/1.2 would be a pretty fantastic 87mm on a cropped sensor. Lightning fast, perfect portrait length...if the "Carl Zeiss" label ever got too expensive for Sony, they might get a good deal on the "Rokkor" name.
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --

Cameron
Acolyte
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:08 am

Re: Bring Back the Classics

Unread postby Cameron » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:28 am

The last version of the Minolta 35 G lens. Just my opinion compared to the newer Sony 35.

I am a pretty big fan of the 200 f/4 macro and 3x-1x f/1.7~2.8 macro. :D Both were fairly expensive in the day of Minolta. I seriously doubt they will ever be reproduced. Never hopes to want!
Cam.


Return to “Lens Lore”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron