Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by bakubo »

User avatar
bfitzgerald
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:48 pm

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by bfitzgerald »

I wouldn't be shocked if it were a tweaked Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 it's entirely possible that's not a bad thing in many ways though.
A good copy of the Tamron should be good at f2/8 in the centre at all focal lengths slight drop off at 50mm but still should be sharp (centre anyway)
The Sigma is good though I can't say it smacks me as "way sharper" at f2/8 because it's weak point is the corners which are poor on the edges wide open up to 35mm. Probably not a problem for most as you'd likely stop down a bit but the tamron is better than the sigma in this respect

It's also half the price which kinda makes it a no brainer for most folks.
Lonnie Utah
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 617
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by Lonnie Utah »

And LL's review....

"In any event, purchasers should feel confident that this is a first rate optic worthy of the "G" designation."

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/revie ... 6_50.shtml
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Lonnie Utah wrote:And LL's review....

"In any event, purchasers should feel confident that this is a first rate optic worthy of the "G" designation."

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/revie ... 6_50.shtml
I'll let you know next week, hopefully. :roll:
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
bfitzgerald
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:48 pm

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by bfitzgerald »

He had to change it due to decentering
The one on SLR Gear shows this problem too (adjust the graph to 50mm f2.8 where it is most obvious)
Wonder why they didn't "G" it strange really still not that it matters.

I'd make sure you check the lens when you get it Dr H hope you get a good one!
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

Cross fingers Barry...
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by Birma »

Very exciting news Doc :) An A77 and the new lens too. Hopefully you will gives us your views here, both as a long time A700 and an A55 user. Also, fingers crossed that your computer is braced for those big files :shock: .
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

The computer is ready, you can count on that. 8)
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
pakodominguez
Minister with Portfolio
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: NYC
Contact:

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by pakodominguez »

Dr. Harout wrote:The computer is ready, you can count on that. 8)
Probably but: your son will allow you to use the new kit?
;-)
Pako
------------
http://www.pakodominguez.photo/blog" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

pakodominguez wrote:...Probably but: your son will allow you to use the new kit?
;-)
:roll: :roll: :roll: that's another issue :roll:
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
Mark K
Grand Caliph
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 4:10 pm

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by Mark K »

Hi folks, my love for Sony 16-50 has led me to review my EF mount Tamron mount 17-50 and found it, after years of purchase, very usable on my 30D.
youpii
Heirophant
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:55 pm

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by youpii »

bfitzgerald wrote:I wouldn't be shocked if it were a tweaked Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 it's entirely possible that's not a bad thing in many ways though.
Image

The two lenses are at least closely related.
jcoffin
Grand Caliph
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by jcoffin »

youpii wrote: The two lenses are at least closely related.
Hmm...the front group looks extremely similar, but the rear group looks like it's heavily redesigned.
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Sony 16-50mm f/2.8 DT SSM test

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

All such lenses are slightly similar - the Sony is more like a Tamron, than it is like a Sigma or a Tokina. And that's all you can really say.

David
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests