It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 3:50 pm

Forum rules


No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.



Post a new topicPost a reply Page 3 of 3   [ 34 posts ]
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 16-50mm SSM lens review now up
Unread postPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 5:35 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Posts: 6049
Location: Kelso, Scotland
It's closer to a 12 megapixel crop, not 10 - 11 point something.

David

_________________
http://www.photoclubalpha.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 16-50mm SSM lens review now up
Unread postPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 6:56 pm 
Viceroy

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:41 pm
Posts: 1173
It's standard size is 3924 x 2656, i.e. 10.4Mp. Unless some raw software may add a few pixels around that.

P.S. Sorry, just checked with manual, it's actually 3984x2656. So it's 10.6Mp. The wrong value above was lifted from dpr :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 16-50mm SSM lens review now up
Unread postPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:07 am 
Oligarch

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 4:37 pm
Posts: 141
I've been trying to sell my 16-80Z for several weeks. Everyone seems to lowball the price. So I took it out of the box today and did a little testing. I've been using the 16-50 with the A77 for a while now. Now that I shot a few shots with the 16-80, I want to keep it again. These two lenses are really complementary. If the 16-80 had SSM, I would not even dream of parting with it. It really is a great lens. And after three years, my copy of the Z has no zoom creep, no fungus, etc. And it is sharp (though vignetting with a filter at 16mm can still occur). Now, do I need both lenses? Not really. Though I have a funny feeling I'd really regret getting rid of the Z.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 16-50mm SSM lens review now up
Unread postPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:38 am 
Initiate

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:26 am
Posts: 32
Like you, I have both lenses and have no intention of selling the CZ. The 16-50 is great for low light and video but a little short. The CZ has great range, and is very compact. If only it had SSM!

_________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A77, 16-80mm CZ, 16-50mm SSM, 70-300mm G SSM, 50mm 1.7, F43AM, F20AM
NEX-6, 16-50mm, LA-EA2


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a new topicPost a reply Page 3 of 3   [ 34 posts ]
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
twilightBB Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net