How wide is wide enough?

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4321
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:25 pm

Dusty,
I see what you mean. In fact, on my recent trip to Peru, I felt wanting on the wide side than zoom more often.
I thought I would sorely miss the 70-400. I just had 16-80 on A77II. Very unlikely setup compared to my typical
outfit.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper

harvey
Oligarch
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby harvey » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:28 pm

Note that there were two Minolta A Mount 17-35mm lenses, an f/2.8-4 (D) and an f/3.5 G

User avatar
Cogito
Grand Caliph
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:41 pm
Location: Chatteris, Cambridgeshire.

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby Cogito » Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:50 pm

sury wrote:Tony,
Thank you for the examples. I thought I would see more distortion at these focal lengths.
Sury

Sury, the link I provided to Dyxum is really quite informative. If you click on a lens, towards the bottom of the lens description you'll see a link to "Dyxum Forum Sample Images". These are for the lens in question and should satisfy any distortion problems you have.
Tony
Be you ever so high, the law is above you. Lord Denning

User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4321
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Fri Aug 26, 2016 11:38 pm

harvey wrote:Note that there were two Minolta A Mount 17-35mm lenses, an f/2.8-4 (D) and an f/3.5 G


Harvey,
Thank you. Did not know that two versions exist. I was looking at f/2.8-4 as recommended anyway.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper

User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4321
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Fri Aug 26, 2016 11:48 pm

Cogito wrote:
sury wrote:Tony,
Thank you for the examples. I thought I would see more distortion at these focal lengths.
Sury

Sury, the link I provided to Dyxum is really quite informative. If you click on a lens, towards the bottom of the lens description you'll see a link to "Dyxum Forum Sample Images". These are for the lens in question and should satisfy any distortion problems you have.


Tony,
I did check the Dyxum images. I meant I thought I would see more distortion but was pleasantly surprised that your photos did not have any distortion. I am convinced. :)

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper

User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4321
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Tue Sep 06, 2016 8:53 pm

What with our nephew having a baby and all that excitement and tension (due to a premature new born), I was quite preoccupied and everything else was put on a back burner for now. Will take it up later.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper

User avatar
Dusty
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2299
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby Dusty » Thu Sep 08, 2016 6:41 pm

sury wrote:What with our nephew having a baby and all that excitement and tension (due to a premature new born), I was quite preoccupied and everything else was put on a back burner for now. Will take it up later.

Sury


What? No photos yet? It's already the 8th!

You're slipping, Sury!

Dusty
A couple of a350's, an a700 and now an a580, plus even more lenses.

User avatar
UrsaMajor
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 675
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:36 am
Location: Southern California

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby UrsaMajor » Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:52 am

sury wrote:
harvey wrote:Note that there were two Minolta A Mount 17-35mm lenses, an f/2.8-4 (D) and an f/3.5 G


Harvey,
Thank you. Did not know that two versions exist. I was looking at f/2.8-4 as recommended anyway.

Sury

If you decide that you want a Minolta 17-35 2.8-4, let me know. I have one which seems to be in very good condition that I got several years ago in the original box as part of a multi-lens package deal. I have only used it a couple of times, as it never seemed to be as good a match for what I wanted to do as one of my other lenses. Now that I am shooting almost exclusively with my E-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras, I am even less likely to be using it, especially since I just shot a number of images a couple of weeks ago with the Sony 16mm pancake lens that I have found to be quite satisfactory for my needs, and the lens that is most frequently installed on my camera today is the Zeiss 24mm.

I'll be happy to sell it to you on the basis of shipping it to you for you to try, with payment expected if you decide to keep it, and you ship it back if you don't like it. Price would be the going market rate. (I have not looked, so I have no idea at the moment what that is.)

- Tom -

User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4321
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:00 pm

Tom,
Thank you. Will let you know.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper


Return to “Lens Lore”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron