bfitzgerald wrote:Minolta/Sony 20mm F2.8
Another prime I toyed with getting, but it was costly on the Sony badge - prices on the Minolta version seem fairly good now
bfitzgerald wrote:Minolta 24mm F2.8
Another never used prime on the might try list
bfitzgerald wrote:Minolta 35mm F1.4 G
Seems some people find this lens to be anything but great from a technical angle, whilst others swear it has a unique "look". I never had this on my list as I find 35mm primes a bit here nor there - ie not wide, not tele
[/quote]bfitzgerald wrote:Any thoughts on those or any lenses not mentioned, sharing experiences might be useful to other users
bfitzgerald wrote:KM did use some Tamron's like the 28-75mm F2.8, which Sony copied, added a SAM motor, and increased the price..cough.
I've not tried that either.
bfitzgerald wrote:Interesting feedback. Question is though, does the 24-70mm live up to expectations optically?
pakodominguez wrote:bfitzgerald wrote:Interesting feedback. Question is though, does the 24-70mm live up to expectations optically?
We are talking about the Sony/Zeiss, right?
Well, I didn't "see" the difference on the A900.
In other hand, on the A7R (36M) and the A7RIII (42MP), I definitely see there is something special about this lens.
I also have to say that I like very much the flavor Capture One give on Sony ARW files, much nicer than what I can get with Lightroom. Probably if I run those old A900+Zeiss files on Capture One, I'll see something different.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests