classiccameras wrote:bakaboo, I read with interest your reply to Barry, I have no data myself to post but I remember one review site saying about one of the top of the range Pentax K mount DSLR's, that they were being a bit optimistic with their ISO claims, that's all I remember. Its the real world pictures that interest me, not lab tests. I got me a EM-10 reduced as the Mk 2 is out, love it to bits and what superb colours I get in Jpeg, I much prefer them to Sony colours.
bakubo wrote:These are interesting articles for people who want to understand this stuff better:
RAW is not Raw
Why ISO Isn't ISO
Sense and Sensitivity
Sensitivity (ISO) in digital imaging seems to be the subject of quite a lot of confusion - it's becoming common to hear talk of manufacturers 'cheating with ISO.' So we thought it made sense look at why sensitivity appears hard to pin down, why we use the definition we do and how it's actually not as complicated as it can sometimes seem.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests