alphaomega wrote:I agree with Dr. Harout that the A900 will have its place in photography and there will be buyers including David Kilpatrick by his own admission. I will not be one of them though. I believe that it will be a good camera. Sony have not been rushing it out. They seem to take their time to get it right. They are probably aiming at getting a camera on the market that will beat the EOS-1D Mk 3 as far as IQ is concerned - particularly when linked with CZ lenses as they become available to cover the range of focal lengths professionals require. They will probably also want to target medium format users who do not need the Hasselblad 39 or 50 MP versions (or cannot afford them). I also think that Canon are taking their time with the 5D replacement. I think that the Nikon and Sony moves into FF has sent Canon back to the drawing board on the 5D replacement. They do not want another 40D situation at 10 Mp compared with the A700 & D300 at 12. They do not want the 5D replacement to look dated on launch - at least that is what I think.
gusm35 wrote:I shoot models, landscapes but also want to shoot sports.
At the moment i have the older minolta lenses 50 1-7, beercan, kit lens 35-70 f4 and a sigma 24 superwide 2-8.
really looking to have faster af.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests