Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

bakubo · Unread post by **bakubo** » Sat Jun 05, 2010 5:55 pm

Yildiz, that is a very nice photo!

aster · Unread post by **aster** » Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:58 pm

bakubo wrote:Yildiz, that is a very nice photo!

Thank you, Henry!

It is, in its own right. (but is not an entry)

Yildiz

bakubo · Unread post by **bakubo** » Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:11 pm

aster wrote:Thank you, Henry!

It is, in its own right. (but is not an entry)

I probably haven't seen every photo you have posted here over the years, but of the ones I have seen I think this is my favorite.

aster · Unread post by **aster** » Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:59 am

bakubo wrote:I probably haven't seen every photo you have posted here over the years, but of the ones I have seen I think this is my favorite.

THANK YOU!

Thank you...Thank you....Thank you...

Yildiz

Birma · Unread post by **Birma** » Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:48 pm

Perhaps a bit on the obvious side

but just in case I can't think of anything more subtle.

A700 with Min 24-105, polariser and ND grad.

KevinBarrett · Unread post by **KevinBarrett** » Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:33 am

Obvious is good! I like it, and nice work with the filters!

Birma · Unread post by **Birma** » Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:39 am

Thanks KB

bossel · Unread post by **bossel** » Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:15 pm

Good composition

and lots of over/under in it. But it does look a bit greenish to me

- did you try with less green/more red? Maybe a side effect of the filters?

Birma · Unread post by **Birma** » Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:15 am

Mmm. I can see what you mean Thomas. I will have to have another look at it at the weekend.

Lonnie Utah · Unread post by **Lonnie Utah** » Mon Jun 21, 2010 4:54 am

UrsaMajor · Unread post by **UrsaMajor** » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:30 am

This image does not qualify for the challenge, as it was taken in 2007, but I happened to be restructuring my image filing system and came across this photo - which I would have entered if it had qualified. It was taken about 2200 hours while returning from a restaurant to my San Diego hotel in May of 2007.

To you it may or may not look like an actual underwater scene in this image, but I can assure you that at first glimpse it looked very real to me that night - and I had not been drinking.

With best wishes,
- Tom -

aster · Unread post by **aster** » Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:45 am

Hi Tom,

With such available light the scene does appear as though there's a gigantic aquarium behind a glass... : ) And it is a nice real-looking sight.

Good catch,

Yildiz

UrsaMajor · Unread post by **UrsaMajor** » Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:02 am

aster wrote:With such available light the scene does appear as though there's a gigantic aquarium behind a glass... : ) And it is a nice real-looking sight.

It looked very real at night, at least for a few seconds, and I assumed at the time that most of that was due to the relatively dim light at night. Two days later I went back to the same location during the day, out of curiosity. I was quite surprised to see how real it looked in daylight. It did not have as much impact as encountering the painting for the first time at night, but it was still rather effective. IMO, the artist did a very nice job that deserves praise.

With best wishes,
- Tom -

Photoclubalpha

Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Re: Photo Challenge #30: "Over and Under"

Who is online