LR vs Adobe Bridge

From RAW conversion to image editing and printing
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: LR vs Adobe Bridge

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

I have both packages. I only use Bridge now. I don't like all the cagtalogue and importing functions of Lightroom and find Bridge faster for a wide range of work on many different sources of files.

David
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: LR vs Adobe Bridge

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

hmmm, have to try it myself...
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: LR vs Adobe Bridge

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

The latest version of Bridge/ACR most certainly does have adjustment brushes and graduated filters - fully compatible with LR, even reads the existing adjustments from LR and you can reactivate the control points and change the settings.

David
User avatar
dennismullen
Acolyte
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:19 pm
Location: Green Bay, WI USA
Contact:

Re: LR vs Adobe Bridge

Unread post by dennismullen »

I'm in full agreement. I have the same issues with "virtual directories". It pains me that Windows has a "virtual desktop".
Using Bridge also makes it easy to right click and open a file in DxO save it to a DNG file and open it in ACR and on to Photoshop.

Cheers,
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests