Argonaut wrote:I've got the model 1 and it's a super camera, even without the upgrades. A pit bull bit it a couple of years ago and Sony said it would cost $300 to replace the screen and in their opinion, not worth it. So I bought a screen off ebay and did it myself. The camera trundles on. Enjoy!
Argonaut wrote:I'm seriously considering buying a mk III because of the viewfinder. The wife insists on a viewfinder.
Argonaut wrote:Just for Bakubo - we are in Kyoto today (!) and in spite of typhoon Jebi went to a Yuzen dyeing class as part of our trip. A friend P*S'd us in fluorescent lighting with my RX100. A dash of white balance in RAW in LR, export jpg and there you are.
bakubo wrote:I charged the battery overnight so this morning I turned it on for the first time, set the date/time, and went through the menu to check it out. I notice that it has firmware 2.0, but on the Sony website it says the newest is 1.1. Hmm. I did some searching though and see that others who bought an RX100 recently also have 2.0. I also read that the current ones being sold have a newer BIONZ processor than what was in it before. Okay, so it seems that although the RX100 came out in 2012 it has been quietly updated a bit without a name change.
ValeryD wrote:Henry! I can not believe you did not take any pictures with the new camera.
You have nerves of steel ... Just tell us about the camera. Where is the photo?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests