It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 3:38 am


Post a new topicPost a reply Page 2 of 2   [ 21 posts ]
Go to page Previous  1, 2

Pretend it was your money:
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85 F1.4 50%  50%  [ 4 ]
Sigma 70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro 25%  25%  [ 2 ]
Tamron SP AF 90 F2.8 Di 25%  25%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 8
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sony 85/1.4 ZA, Sigma 70/2.8 Macro, or Tamron 90/2.8 Mac
Unread postPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:55 am 
Minister with Portfolio
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 2158
Location: NYC
Hi Kevin,
So?
what happened?
did you get your 70-200 f2.8?
show us your pics!

_________________
Pako
------------
http://www.phototeka.net/qosqo.php


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sony 85/1.4 ZA, Sigma 70/2.8 Macro, or Tamron 90/2.8 Mac
Unread postPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:03 am 
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Posts: 2548
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
In the end, I got the Sigma 70/2.8 macro. I couldn't justify spending $800 to get one stop over my beercan, even if the Sigma 70-200/2.8 is sharper overall, its still a lens I'd have to stop down for ultimate sharpness. I began this search trying to find a lens that would be sharp at f/2.8, and by all sources, the Sigma macro is that lens. My brother loves his, and I've always been envious. The thought crossed my mind that the Tamron 60/2 macro should have been an option, but I can't rule out going to a full-frame camera eventually.

_________________
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sony 85/1.4 ZA, Sigma 70/2.8 Macro, or Tamron 90/2.8 Mac
Unread postPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 8:22 am 
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Posts: 5474
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Congratulations and enjoy it Kevin.

_________________
A99 + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sony 85/1.4 ZA, Sigma 70/2.8 Macro, or Tamron 90/2.8 Mac
Unread postPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:05 am 
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Posts: 2548
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Meh, I'm kind-of underwhelmed. The Sigma 70/2.8 Macro got here yesterday and I spent the morning playing with it. It isn't as sharp as I'd been led to expect, or maybe my lens is a dud. Either way, I don't think macro photography is right for me, or this isn't the right season for it, or Texas isn't the right place. I hate using tripods and the paper-thin DoF makes tripods a necessity. So, the close-focusing capability of what is probably a very nice macro lens is wasted on me.

As a portrait lens, the Sigma becomes redundent for me. Though the f/2.8 aperture should mean accurate auto-focusing, mine seemed to hunt quite a bit, and sixteen AF-screw turns from 1:1 to infinity takes a good while. The beercan focuses much faster and maybe a bit more accurately, too. F/2.8 is nice, but again, the lens isn't at its best there. Above f/4.5 the lens starts to act like a beercan with a bokeh upgrade; smoother and more circular OOF highlights. My beercan already behaves very well at 70mm, with plenty of sharpness and no CA to speak of, so I can't see carrying both lenses.

The Sigma 70mm is going back. I'm sure it's a good macro lens, but I learned my lesson about using a macro for portraiture. A side effect of this experience: I REALLY appreciate all the lenses I already own. I'll rent another body for my upcoming wedding and use the Tamron 17-50 on one and the beercan on the other. As for a lens purchase with my "allowance," I'll wait and see about the new Sigma 85/1.4, or maybe the Tokina 11-16/2.8.

_________________
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sony 85/1.4 ZA, Sigma 70/2.8 Macro, or Tamron 90/2.8 Mac
Unread postPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:25 am 
Minister with Portfolio
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 2158
Location: NYC
mmm
I'm sure the 70-200 f2.8 was THE lens that will make you happy -get it and sell the Beercan!
;-)

_________________
Pako
------------
http://www.phototeka.net/qosqo.php


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sony 85/1.4 ZA, Sigma 70/2.8 Macro, or Tamron 90/2.8 Mac
Unread postPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:28 am 
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm
Posts: 2548
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
pakodominguez wrote:
mmm
I'm sure the 70-200 f2.8 was THE lens that will make you happy -get it and sell the Beercan!
;-)


Your store quit selling it! It's back to August availability with B&H and Amazon...

_________________
Kevin Barrett
-- Photos --


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a new topicPost a reply Page 2 of 2   [ 21 posts ]
Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
twilightBB Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net