It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 12:36 am


Post a new topicPost a reply Page 1 of 1   [ 11 posts ]
Author Message
 Post subject: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:52 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Posts: 6036
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Just gone live with a web version of the April 2007 Photoworld flash test report:

http://photoclubalpha.com/?p=73

David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:57 am 
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Posts: 2017
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
I've just been thinking of flashes, and thought that it would be a good time for you to update this article. Now that we have more models that are supposed to use Sony TTL from Bower, Sunpak and Vivitar, as well as more Metz models, maybe we could get another look at what works?

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:19 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Posts: 6036
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Erm... possibly, if I could get the third party models. Not so easy here. Example, we don't have Bower at all and the most active third party flash brand right now is Nissin who don't seem to be doing much for Alpha.

David

_________________
http://www.photoclubalpha.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:24 pm 
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:48 pm
Posts: 2487
That shot of the glass trophy indicated a problem with the A100 flash metering. I've seen that before on that model. But I have never experienced that degree of underexposure with any A mount body ADI or TTL.

Also noticed something strange even not using a D lens switching to ADI seems to influence exposure.
I tend to use TTL myself esp for outdoor fill in shots.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:04 pm 
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Posts: 5436
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Why not expanding the article including all models from Sony as well as 3rd party ones? Why not making a flash database?
May I be of assistance? But please don't push me to write an article, I'm too bad at it. Just tell me what to shoot with my brand new HVL-MT24AM and I'll do it for you, but you have to do the writing . People (members and non members alike) should have Photoclubalpha as a referral.
Or even, why not include all active members to do the task, alone or by groups?

_________________
A99 + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 5:43 pm 
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Posts: 2017
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Dr. Harout wrote:
Why not expanding the article including all models from Sony as well as 3rd party ones? Why not making a flash database?
May I be of assistance? But please don't push me to write an article, I'm too bad at it. Just tell me what to shoot with my brand new HVL-MT24AM and I'll do it for you, but you have to do the writing . People (members and non members alike) should have Photoclubalpha as a referral.
Or even, why not include all active members to do the task, alone or by groups?


Good idea, Doc. However, we'd have to set some test parameters, and develop some type of 'standard' scene to shoot with the various flashes. We'd also need some sort of step-by-step checklist to work off of.

The idea of a flash database thrills me! Can I get an inexpensive flash that does what I need without paying thru the nose for features I have no need for? Check the database! Will this flash do xyz?? Check the database!

I volunteer to so data coordination and set up the initial database - I do that all day long now. I already have quite a list of fields in mine.

Any more volunteers?

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:40 pm 
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Posts: 5436
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
So this calls for a new section: Test bench
What's your opinion David?

_________________
A99 + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 2:55 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Posts: 6036
Location: Kelso, Scotland
I don't have the programming knowledge to set up a Dyxum-style review/test/specifications section on the site, or in the forum. I'll try to find if any add-ons exist to enable this.

David

_________________
http://www.photoclubalpha.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:48 pm 
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Posts: 2017
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
David Kilpatrick wrote:
I don't have the programming knowledge to set up a Dyxum-style review/test/specifications section on the site, or in the forum. I'll try to find if any add-ons exist to enable this.

David



David,

Any luck finding such an add-on?

If not, I can look into creating a site that we could link to. The big thing here is to actually set up appropriate test parameters so that we're comparing apples to apples.

Dusty


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:21 pm 
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Posts: 5436
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Go Dusty, go!

_________________
A99 + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Flash review on line
Unread postPosted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 4:44 pm 
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Posts: 5352
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
I guess all we really want to know about a particular flash is, does it have the features and performance as claimed, and also if there is any wonky stuff the manufacturer neglected too mention.
Greg


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a new topicPost a reply Page 1 of 1   [ 11 posts ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
twilightBB Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net