It is currently Tue Sep 02, 2014 5:42 pm


Post a new topicPost a reply Page 2 of 2   [ 28 posts ]
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:18 pm 
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:58 pm
Posts: 1708
Location: Netherlands
I agree with you assessment alphaomega, although the camera would've been perfect if the screen was tiltable. Taking lower angle shots is a real pain now.

I actually sold my Nex kit in favor of the RX100. Yes, sometimes miss the larger sensor, tiltable screen and higher ISO capability, but it's nothing I can't get over. The smaller size outweighs these factors for me.

Mark

_________________
Flickr gallery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:09 am 
Heirophant

Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:32 pm
Posts: 102
Location: Bedworth, Warwickshire
There is a big difference between the Fuji X10/X20 and the RX100 - size. You can put the RX100 in pretty well any pocket. You need a big jacket pocket for the Fuji. This is a very important difference. I would say that the X20 is going to be a much better camera than the RX100 but if you want a camera that will be with you at all times then it's the RX100 for you and there is simply no point in making the camera larger by adding a viewfinder as it would negate the whole raison d'etre of it.

_________________
Bob Johnston


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 7:04 pm 
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:48 pm
Posts: 3237
I carry a case for a compact camera so I've no need to put it in a pocket. Something that is good for IQ is ideal for this purpose.
Sony deserve credit for the concept, and small size and the IQ looks very good too from what I have seen.

But there are times I get frustrated in harsh light with a back LCD, so a viewfinder is something I do like even if it's just once in a while I use it.
For this reason, Fuji have bucked the trend by offering a viewfinder in models like this. That is why IMO they are getting a lot more interest from photographers.
I'll probably give the X20 a bash in the year if it's free from the Fuji goofs we've had to put up with for a while!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:43 pm 
Viceroy

Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:20 pm
Posts: 1157
Had my RX100 out a few times now. My NEX-6 has had to stay at home. Very impressed by the images produced by this little thingy. Compared with my Lumix LX5 I love the bigger files and the ability to crop without worrying about remaining file size. Not managed to start video yet by accident. AF is fast and exposure accurate. I feel as if I have "found the holy grail" for a pocket camera. I have been through Fuji 900, LX2, LX3 and LX5. Bought the NEX-6 with 16-50 pancake and I now feel I have arrived at some sort of destination. No longer wonder about my next carry everywhere camera. It has arrived.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:02 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Posts: 6173
Location: Kelso, Scotland
If it had GPS I'd have one again straight away!

David

_________________
http://www.photoclubalpha.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:45 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Posts: 6173
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Found a mint boxed almost unused one on eBay for about the same price as I sold mine. Rebought. May regret it with Focus coming up, bargains possible, but I realise that this camera is much better than anything else when I thought at the time there would be further advances. Althoughn I use my NEX kit a reasonable amount, I can see that I just don't use it enough; I use my Fuji F770EXR a fair amount, but it is very challenged for ultimate image quality.

David

_________________
http://www.photoclubalpha.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:49 pm 
Minister with Portfolio
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 2353
Location: NYC
David Kilpatrick wrote:
Found a mint boxed almost unused one on eBay for about the same price as I sold mine. Rebought. May regret it with Focus coming up, bargains possible, but I realise that this camera is much better than anything else when I thought at the time there would be further advances. Althoughn I use my NEX kit a reasonable amount, I can see that I just don't use it enough; I use my Fuji F770EXR a fair amount, but it is very challenged for ultimate image quality.

David

;-)
It is such a camera... I bought one last year, used it for a couple of months or so, and sold it. I'm always tempted to buy one again. But I already decided that the NEX 7 is my everyday "pocket" camera, I don't need more cameras, even beautiful ones like this -Even the wife ask me once in a while about this little beauty, that she liked also very much, and why I don't get one. Let's see what happens with the next generation...

_________________
Pako
------------
http://www.phototeka.net/qosqo.php


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:50 pm 
Minister with Portfolio
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 2353
Location: NYC
David Kilpatrick wrote:
If it had GPS I'd have one again straight away!

David

I know is not the same, but can't you register a waypoint with your smartphone? then you add the location on LR4...

_________________
Pako
------------
http://www.phototeka.net/qosqo.php


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:12 pm 
Imperial Ambassador
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:22 pm
Posts: 559
While they are bigge than the RX100 and less flexible than the NEX series, the Fuji X100s looks to be a very desirable little camera as would be the various iterations of the Sigma DPM if only their raw files could be converted in Lightroom. The latter, in particular, looks to be a wonderful camera for landscape photography - and not just when weight is an issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 1:50 am 
Minister with Portfolio
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 2353
Location: NYC
artington wrote:
While they are bigge than the RX100 and less flexible than the NEX series, the Fuji X100s looks to be a very desirable little camera as would be the various iterations of the Sigma DPM if only their raw files could be converted in Lightroom. The latter, in particular, looks to be a wonderful camera for landscape photography - and not just when weight is an issue.

The Fuji X100s is not really small (bigger than any NEX) but it still is a desirable camera. I saw the Fuji REP the other day, he was carrying the camera so I took it for 5 minutes and played around with it. AF is better than the previous model and the hybrid viewfinder works wonderfully in both positions. But, as I told you before, it is far from been a "little camera"

_________________
Pako
------------
http://www.phototeka.net/qosqo.php


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 2:25 am 
Minister with Portfolio
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 2353
Location: NYC
I was thinking about the new NEX-3N, that is really small. and pocketable thanks to the pancake kit lens 16-50. For 500$, it is almost as small as the RX100 and cost 150 less!
Well, the zoom is shorter (75mm equivalent against 100mm on the RX100) and it is not f1.8 at he wide end. I believe the RX100 have better video modes.
If I shop (again) for a pocketable camera, I think the NEX-3N will get first on the list.

_________________
Pako
------------
http://www.phototeka.net/qosqo.php


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:41 am 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Posts: 6173
Location: Kelso, Scotland
The RX100 AF during video - and the sheet quality of the video, for sharpness - is better than Alpha or NEX.

This is not very exciting, as it is just a technical exercise, but -

http://youtu.be/gvmHFG2e1xY

View it at full 1080p. I do not think a NEX could do this, I've had reasonable tracking of focus with the 16mm f/2.8 but of course the NEX does not focus close like this - not down to a few cm.

First day at Focus, I used NEX and RX100. Second day, only used the RX100. Nothing else.

David

_________________
http://www.photoclubalpha.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My RX100 first report - review now up
Unread postPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:33 am 
Minister with Portfolio
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:38 pm
Posts: 2353
Location: NYC
Hi David,

I saw the video on Facebook. The lens on the. RX100 is specially good at the wide end (the rest of the zoom is average...) and sharp wide open. I don't believe the SEL 16-50 is a match for the RX100 lens. -the only reason I'll consider to buy the next RX100 generation is if Sony improves the zoom quality at thje long end.

_________________
Pako
------------
http://www.phototeka.net/qosqo.php


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a new topicPost a reply Page 2 of 2   [ 28 posts ]
Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
twilightBB Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net