How wide is wide enough?

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4687
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:24 pm

The widest lens I have is 24 (both FF and FF equivalent) and am wondering if I am missing something
not having a wider lens. If so, can you recommend a lens? It would be a a new area of photography
for me and certainly a learning experience at the least. I am brand agnostic and my
camera bodies are A100 (still working), A700, A900 and A77MII. As of now, not planning to move to
E-mount.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper

User avatar
Dusty
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby Dusty » Fri Jul 15, 2016 4:31 pm

Sury, You are missing a bit. My widest ever was a 21mm on my old x700, and it really showed the difference!

Now days, I sometime use the panoramic feature on my a580, but that's not quite the same as a wide angle. You'll miss the top and bottom, but then again, many times that's just sky and ground, unless you're inside some interesting architecture.

I was planning on getting the Sigma 8-16, but I'm holding off as I may switch mounts since I have EVFs and would like more pixels and better DR that newer sensors have. That's for APS-C. On FF David likes the Sigma 12-24 just about as well. 12mm on APS-c still gives you a tremendously wide 18mm perspective, so it would do you good on the a77 as well.

Of course, if you want a cheap way of looking at the results, Rokinon, etc. have screw on 'fisheye converters'. On wide lenses they distort quite a bit, like a fisheye would, on a bit longer lenses mine doesn't seem to distort, just really wide the perspective.

Dusty
An a700 and couple of a580s, plus even more lenses.

User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4687
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:08 pm

Thank you Dusty. Let me take a look at Sigma 12-24. Not keen on screw on converters.
I used to think Pano was the solution to not having a UWA lens and do realize it may not
be so all the time.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper

User avatar
the_hefay
Viceroy
Posts: 1202
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 7:32 am
Location: Wyoming, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby the_hefay » Fri Jul 15, 2016 10:10 pm

To answer your question, I suppose it really depends on what you're photographing. The Tokina 11-16 is as wide as I've ever needed except for a few rare instances. In my experience there was only once, maybe twice that I wished I had wider than that for landscape. For interior shots, there have been a few more times, but overall, this lens has filled a spot in my photography that I didn't know existed. Keep in mind that I use crop sensor cameras, therefore 11-16 would be similar to a FF with a 17-24.
Image

User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4687
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Fri Jul 15, 2016 10:29 pm

From what I understand, the UWA is primarily for landscape and architecture. I have taken those pictures with
my existing lenses but wondering having right tools would have made them better. Tokina 11-16 could nicely
complement my 16-80 on A77M2 as well with 70-400 complementing the long end. Thanks for the input.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper

Edward
Acolyte
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2015 8:47 pm

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby Edward » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:37 am

I think Sigma makes an ultra wide for crop sensor cameras. I have the 12-24 and its a great lens. For the 70-400 I have the Sony lens, but the similar lens from Sigma is probably great too -- and I say that because I had the Sony 24-70cz and if I set it to 24mm I can't tell if a picture was taken with the Sony or the Sigma.

User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4687
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:52 am

Edward,
Thank you for your input. Looks like Sigma 12-24 seems to be a good candidate.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper

peterottaway
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 601
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:24 am
Location: Northam, Western Australia

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby peterottaway » Thu Jul 21, 2016 6:47 am

I do own the Tokina 11-16 and a Sony 16-35 which I do use wide at times, but to be honest many of my landscape work in the past was done using 28-70 or 24-85 lenses.

OK the wider lenses are useful for some architectural photos and cityscapes especially in Old Towns but that is it for me.

If I use my Nikon D750 kit then I have the 28,35,60 and 85 for certain plus on occasions my now rather elderly 180. With the A7 cameras I haven't so far splashed out on any new wides so it is usually the 24-70 followed by the 70-200 and in last place the 16-35.

Yes I do have adapters for my various Contax lenses which include the 18 and 21 primes but these are very much special purpose lenses. The most used of the Contax lenses is the 24=85 AF lens which is a brute of a thing in comparison to older lenses, but these days its 82mm filters don't seem that silly any more.

User avatar
bakubo
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5696
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby bakubo » Thu Jul 21, 2016 8:05 am

Sury, 24mm as your widest is fine for landscapes. Even 28mm. You can shoot landscapes with pretty much any focal length, even telephotos. Just depends on what kind of shot you want to make. An UWA (wider than 24mm) for typical landscapes is most of the time going to disappoint you, I think. They can be very cool for somewhat unusual perspectives, something close in the foreground with the background receding, etc. Just having an even wider view for the run of the mill type of landscape shots though will probably make you unsatisfied.

I have always had one for various mounts since 1991 when I got a Tokina 20-35mm. For digital APS-C I have had a 10-20mm and an 11-18mm. Now with m4/3 I have a 9-18mm. I don't use them for typical landscapes though. I don't use an UWA much, but it is good to have for certain kinds of shots so I always carry one when I travel.

User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4687
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Thu Jul 21, 2016 10:43 pm

Thank you Henry for your perspective. I have seen people gushing over wider than 24 (my reference point),
and that piqued my curiosity. One underlying nagging is that do I want to buy another A-mount lens.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper

User avatar
bakubo
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5696
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby bakubo » Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:22 am

sury wrote:Thank you Henry for your perspective. I have seen people gushing over wider than 24 (my reference point),
and that piqued my curiosity.


If you don't know how you would specifically use it then I suggest not getting one. You can probably search around for photos, good ones, taken with UWA lenses to get an idea of what they are good for and what they are not good for. You will likely find lots of very uninteresting photos along with some very nice ones. I do understand that sometimes one just wants to get something though and if that is the case here then go ahead. :)

sury wrote:One underlying nagging is that do I want to buy another A-mount lens.


Yes, I hear you.

classiccameras
Viceroy
Posts: 922
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:33 am

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby classiccameras » Fri Jul 22, 2016 6:38 pm

In my 35-mm SLR days 24-mm was considered ultra wide and any thing wider was almost in Fish Eye territory. A 28-mm and 35-mm wide was my usual lens for landscape and vintage motor cars etc, but we were always concerned about wide angle distortion, so careful camera position was important and of course we never had Photo Shop. I never liked converging verticals, especially on tall buildings unless you wanted that for artistic effect. So use ultra wide's carefully.

User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 4687
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby sury » Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:27 pm

Thank you classiccameras. Since I have not done any wide angle photography (at least knowingly), the intent is to
explore the genre, for want of a better term. Essentially learn what to do and what not to do. I always used pano
stitching as my answer to UWA lenses or lack thereof, and that is not always desirable especially with moving objects.

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper

User avatar
Cogito
Grand Caliph
Posts: 264
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:41 pm
Location: Chatteris, Cambridgeshire.

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby Cogito » Fri Aug 19, 2016 10:32 pm

Sury, if you haven't made your mind up yet, why not check out the lenses on http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/results.asp?chbLensType=3
The lens marks out of 5 are much of a muchness and most lenses have entries in the Dyxum sample images so you can judge for yourself......
Tony
Be you ever so high, the law is above you. Lord Denning

User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6679
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: How wide is wide enough?

Unread postby Birma » Fri Aug 19, 2016 10:58 pm

Hi Sury, I suggest the Sigma 12-24 (current or previous marks). This will work on your full-frame and aps-c bodies. The 12mm end is plenty wide enough to experience UWA. If you just want more room left and right then panos might still be the best option. The UWA is for me as much about near and far perspective; how things close to you, and far away from you, look.

Perhaps rent one for a trip?
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.


Return to “Lens Lore”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests