Hi.
I would like to introduce myself, but have already done that in another room, should have looked first.
Please feel free to take a look at my flickr site and leave comments good or bad.
New from East Yorkshire
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:40 pm
New from East Yorkshire
Old Photographers Never Die, They Just Go Out Of focus
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gordon_mcgeachie/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gordon_mcgeachie/
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:40 pm
Thanks David.
I heard about the 7d coming out when I had a case full of 35mm kit, I decided that I would wait and then just change the body.
Since going digital, I changed some of my lenses and then sold my 7xi to a family friend.
I just want to get the A700 (with the grip) next and a Sigma 18-50 EX and maybe the Sony 500 mirror ( for wildlife)of the Sigma 170-500 ( for airshows).
What is your view on these two lenses?
I heard about the 7d coming out when I had a case full of 35mm kit, I decided that I would wait and then just change the body.
Since going digital, I changed some of my lenses and then sold my 7xi to a family friend.
I just want to get the A700 (with the grip) next and a Sigma 18-50 EX and maybe the Sony 500 mirror ( for wildlife)of the Sigma 170-500 ( for airshows).
What is your view on these two lenses?
Old Photographers Never Die, They Just Go Out Of focus
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gordon_mcgeachie/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gordon_mcgeachie/
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
The mirror is great but strangely limited. You have so little control, and I have never found mine to be especially sharp. The Sigma 50-500mm is a far better bet than any other choice, especially teamed with a Sigma 18-50mm, but of course the 170-500mm is far lower in price. It is not as good, despite having a less ambitious specification.
David
David
- Omega892
- Oligarch
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:13 pm
- Location: Fareham, Hants. UK.
- Contact:
I have one of those, known as the 'Bigma' in some circles and when trying to chase aircraft around the sky with that one understands why. It is arm-achingly heavy and tends to hunt if you move off-target. Thus I find manual focusing better and wish it were a one touch for zoom and focus.David Kilpatrick wrote:The Sigma 50-500mm is a far better bet than any other choice, David
'Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.' - Benjamin Franklin
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:40 pm
I think the `bigma` is a bit out of my money range.
My biggest lens at the moment is the Sigma 400 f5.6 bought back in 1990, and I thought the zoom would fill the gap from 300-500.( I have the Sigma 28-300)
I had the Tamron 500 mirror when I had my Minolta X700`s, it was ajoy to use hand held when used with the MD1 drive attached.
My biggest lens at the moment is the Sigma 400 f5.6 bought back in 1990, and I thought the zoom would fill the gap from 300-500.( I have the Sigma 28-300)
I had the Tamron 500 mirror when I had my Minolta X700`s, it was ajoy to use hand held when used with the MD1 drive attached.
Old Photographers Never Die, They Just Go Out Of focus
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gordon_mcgeachie/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gordon_mcgeachie/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests