Star photography first attempt
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:42 pm
- Location: Williamsport, PA
Star photography first attempt
So I'm totally new to photography, just bought a used a55 in pretty great shape and this is from my first night attempting star photography, lemme know what you think! http://imgur.com/npl76
Last edited by Firsttimeuser on Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Just bought a used a55, definately new to all of this!
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: Really trying to get into this photography thing
Welcome aboard! I'd say very impressive, no ghosting from that SLT mirror, and placing the poles and wires as a foreground works well.
Can I suggest you display the image using the forum code provided by your hosting:
You'll then get more response and comment.
David
Can I suggest you display the image using the forum code provided by your hosting:
You'll then get more response and comment.
David
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6117
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Star photography first attempt
Hi
I’m always interested in sky views even though I hardly ever take any photos of it myself, but do have a telescope and friends who have telescopes.
I got to wondering what your photo actually depicted (what you were photographing from your location) so I found a planetarium on the web http://www.skyviewcafe.com/skyview.php?ie9pass=true put in the Latitude and Longitude for Williamsport and juggled the direction of view until I had an approximate match. I already suspected that the triangular formation of stars in your photo (upper right) was Taurus anyway, you guys look at things upside down compared to me but Taurus is fairly distinctive.
Not a bad photo actually I tried a couple of times in the past and got way more noise than that. One thing the camera seems to do well is pick up lots more stars than the eye can see, at least that’s how it was for me.
Greg
I’m always interested in sky views even though I hardly ever take any photos of it myself, but do have a telescope and friends who have telescopes.
I got to wondering what your photo actually depicted (what you were photographing from your location) so I found a planetarium on the web http://www.skyviewcafe.com/skyview.php?ie9pass=true put in the Latitude and Longitude for Williamsport and juggled the direction of view until I had an approximate match. I already suspected that the triangular formation of stars in your photo (upper right) was Taurus anyway, you guys look at things upside down compared to me but Taurus is fairly distinctive.
Not a bad photo actually I tried a couple of times in the past and got way more noise than that. One thing the camera seems to do well is pick up lots more stars than the eye can see, at least that’s how it was for me.
Greg
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:42 pm
- Location: Williamsport, PA
Re: Star photography first attempt
Ah alright, I'll post the actual lat/long when I get on my own computer since I had GPS tagging turned on to see if you can get a better match at all
Just bought a used a55, definately new to all of this!
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6117
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Star photography first attempt
Hi
The view is pretty close to what you were looking at I think but the main thing that's not the same is the view angle (amount of sky coverage), I couldn't find the zoom function on the web based planetarium to match your view angle more closely...it needs to be zoomed in a bit.
Greg
The view is pretty close to what you were looking at I think but the main thing that's not the same is the view angle (amount of sky coverage), I couldn't find the zoom function on the web based planetarium to match your view angle more closely...it needs to be zoomed in a bit.
Greg
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests