Photoclubalpha

WOW Sonolta, I am certain of a serious misunderstanding about the cartoon with the “rolls eyes”! Out of simple amazement of Canons achievement, and Michael’s article, I posted the “roll eyes”. Please accept my sincere apologies for using the wrong cartoon. Should not have come across as a negative, ...

Call them Sony G or C Z, my main concern is that Sony puts adequate cattle in the market at similar prices that Nikon and Canon charge. They don't have to match them lens for lens and mm for mm, after all just look at how many Canon 70 - 200 are on offer. But to be taken seriously Sony does need to...

I have the 28 f/2 and the 100 f/2.8 soft focus, but I was extremely disappointed as I was with the 100 2. I never experienced this with film at ISO 50 or 25. At first I thought it was the focus setting in the A9 but no matter what I do it is just not as pleasing as the A7.

What happen to the Legendary Minolta 100 f/2.0 on the Alpha 900? I am not as pleased with this lens as I was with the 700, etc.

I am not aware of Minolta, Konica or Sony making a 70-210 f/2.8 lens.

Optically, all three of the Minolta 300 f/2.8 are supposed to be the same. I purchased the 3rd. Minolta version of this lens sometime in the late 90’s after the Minolta 9 and Minolta 9Ti came out. (Minolta AF 300/2.8 APO G (D) SSM). It came in an aluminum case and a free of charge coupon or certific...

Welcome to the forum Physasst. I cannot comment on the lenses but can grant you a good advice: I know that when saying "Unfortunately, I am married..." is a joke, but I do know also it restricts you of expanding your system. So on whichever opportunity make a small present to your wife: A...

Any thoughts on the Leica D Lux 4?

Yea its a good camera. Here is a pretty good review done the first part of this month Dynax 60 aka Maxxum 70

http://www.alphamountworld.com/reviews/ ... -maxxum-70

Looks like a G10 is as up there as an A900 http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/kidding.shtml I picked up a G10 about 10 days ago and it does really well for a point and shoot at ISO 80. ISO 200 and above it looks like a photo copied from a 1970 color Television Set. Noise is bad. No, it is wo...

Only if it were true.

I had to send an a700 to Precision because of serious back focus issues and I include 7 detailed photographs with back focus issues. Twice they sent it back to me with a letter stating they had cleaned the sensor including a letter on how to take photos to control blur. HUH? My 700 had become a manu...

I think the a900 reminds me of working with transparencies like Velvia 50 shot at ISO 40 and the Kodacrome films using only the jpeg image that comes out of the camera. Post processed from Raw, I think you get better images. Mine tends to underexpose about 1/3 of a stop to protect the highlights. Th...

So how do we get it universal? LOL