Sony Ring Light vs. Sigma Ring Flash EM-140

Discussion of all digital SLR cameras under the Minolta and Konica Minolta brands
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Old Hydro
Initiate
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:09 am

Sony Ring Light vs. Sigma Ring Flash EM-140

Unread post by Old Hydro »

Does anyone know of a real review of these devices? There are a number of comments around on the net saying "I like," but nothing else.

I'm leaning towards the Sony, since I can find it for under $300. But I don't know if that is smart move or not.
Javelin
Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
Posts: 1856
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:51 pm

Re: Sony Ring Light vs. Sigma Ring Flash EM-140

Unread post by Javelin »

The Sony Ring Light is a complete waste of time and doesn't even fit your camera without an adaptor. it's also not a flash, just a light so it will not freeze motion. The Sigma is at least a flash and works pretty well. it has a lot of features. If your not using one of the SLT cameras there is a Marumi/Delta/Bower branded (they all look the same) flash that is compatable and will give you TTL support as well. it's cheap but not as full featured as the Sigma.
Andy B
Heirophant
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:02 am
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA

Re: Sony Ring Light vs. Sigma Ring Flash EM-140

Unread post by Andy B »

I had the Sony Ring Light and found it all but useless for anything but product and still-life shots. It went through batteries pretty quickly also. Sold it and bought the Sigma ring flash when Amazon put it on sale for about $196 awhile back. Haven't used it much yet, but it's definitely much better for outdoor macro shots and portraits.
User avatar
Scooterman
Oligarch
Posts: 190
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 4:14 pm
Location: F.O.D. Uk

Re: Sony Ring Light vs. Sigma Ring Flash EM-140

Unread post by Scooterman »

Ring lights are just that, not much good for other than lighting.
As the others have said the Sigma is far better, or you could try one of the flash gun conversions made by Flaghead, I have not used one myself,a friend of mine has with Nikon and he says it works well, you won't be able to switch sides (right or left) If you want to use this sort of thing lots of times go for the Sigma flash it may cost more but it willdo all you ask.
regards
Richard
Andy B
Heirophant
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:02 am
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA

Re: Sony Ring Light vs. Sigma Ring Flash EM-140

Unread post by Andy B »

You might find the following article helpful:

http://shutterbug.com/equipmentreviews/ ... 1110macro/
User avatar
DrScottNicol
Oligarch
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:50 am
Location: Kent, UK
Contact:

Re: Sony Ring Light vs. Sigma Ring Flash EM-140

Unread post by DrScottNicol »

I picked up the ring light (again, mistakenly thinking it was a flash unit) but am reasonably happy with it for what it is. However, I was lucky to pick it up as an 'end of line' bargain in PC world for 149 GBP - at 280 or 300 plus it goes for at Jessops, I might have returned it.

Scott
Sony NEX 5n (IR Conversion) / Nex 5r / a55 / NEX 6 / Dynax 7 / a77 user

http://www.SNICOLPHOTOS.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/drsnicol
Old Hydro
Initiate
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:09 am

Re: Sony Ring Light vs. Sigma Ring Flash EM-140

Unread post by Old Hydro »

DrScottNicol wrote:I picked up the ring light (again, mistakenly thinking it was a flash unit) but am reasonably happy with it for what it is. However, I was lucky to pick it up as an 'end of line' bargain in PC world for 149 GBP - at 280 or 300 plus it goes for at Jessops, I might have returned it.

Scott
DrScottNicol wrote:I picked up the ring light (again, mistakenly thinking it was a flash unit) but am reasonably happy with it for what it is. However, I was lucky to pick it up as an 'end of line' bargain in PC world for 149 GBP - at 280 or 300 plus it goes for at Jessops, I might have returned it.

Scott
I would not pay the Sony price either. But I found one on ebay for $200 and its about what I expected. Not great, but not bad for what it is. After playing a bit, I figure its a going to a great tool for copying documents that are in archives and can't be taken to a copier.

I'm going to ask the US National Archives if they will allow its use on documents. They allow a few LED scanners to be used. Maybe this device will pass their concerns too.

Someday soon I'll try it on spring flowers too. If winter ever leaves.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests