a100 vs a700 -- Exposure Metering
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:31 pm
Last night I took a number of pictures with my a100 using a Tamron 17-50 lens and the HVL-56am flash unit. Although we had a few lights on, the room was fairly dimly lit. I set the aperture at a variety of settings ranging from 2.8 to 5.6, ISO at 400, turned the flash on and pointed it directly at my subjects with no diffusers of any kind, and let the camera choose the shutter speed. The result: all of my pictures came out very dark. All of them were at least one stop underexposed. Even when I added +1 exposure compensation, the pictures were still fairly dark. All of them looked good in the LCD window, by the way, but once I got them on my computer it was clear that they were very underexposed.
The only way I could get a close-to-properly exposed picture was to go to full manual mode and set a much slower shutter speed than the camera was choosing.
The same thing happened to me the night before using the Sony 50mm 1.4 lens, so I know it's not a lens issue.
I should add that DRO was turned off.
The bottom line is that I can ultimately get the correct exposure, but with this camera it often takes a lot of trial and error to do it. And along the way, I miss a lot of good pictures.
My main question is whether the Sony a700 is better at exposure metering than the a100. I've been thinking of upgrading for awhile now, but if the a700 doesn't improve in this area, I don't know if it's worth the $$, since exposure metering is pretty much my only gripe about the a100.
Any words of wisdom would be much appreciated!
Chriznatch
The only way I could get a close-to-properly exposed picture was to go to full manual mode and set a much slower shutter speed than the camera was choosing.
The same thing happened to me the night before using the Sony 50mm 1.4 lens, so I know it's not a lens issue.
I should add that DRO was turned off.
The bottom line is that I can ultimately get the correct exposure, but with this camera it often takes a lot of trial and error to do it. And along the way, I miss a lot of good pictures.
My main question is whether the Sony a700 is better at exposure metering than the a100. I've been thinking of upgrading for awhile now, but if the a700 doesn't improve in this area, I don't know if it's worth the $$, since exposure metering is pretty much my only gripe about the a100.
Any words of wisdom would be much appreciated!
Chriznatch