

A330/18-55 kit lens




Ahhhh David, thank you for that explanation, I realised straight away that the 16mm lens had a special quality that permitted shooting direct into the sun....and I agree totally that I have never been able to do that before...so thats the reason....check these out from the same set, I thought these were remarkable for the lack of flare, and I have oft wondered how come the lens is so small....I do wish Sony would release a fixed 35mm (ish) lens though, maybe it will come in timeDavid Kilpatrick wrote:People who criticise the 16mm forget that its very simple 5-element design - never before seen in a 24mm f/2.8 equivalent - is exceptional for resiting flare, meaning you can shoot right into the sun like your fishing shot. Try that on a vintage 24mm Minolta on film/full frame.
David



Well I am happy with my 16mm lens, it looks great at 100% too so you must have been unlucky, re: the shots into the sun, I was very pleased with those, I seem to remember I had to apply considerable -ve ev, but with an LCD it is easy to see how much you need to apply.alphaomega wrote:These are beautiful pictures. The 16mm pancake ones appear to be sharp at the corners. How are they at 100%? I got a defective one, which has been repaired by Sony and performs much better now, but still not so good at F2.8. Amazing the lack of flare. I must try that when the weather improves in this part of the world. The A330 picture has good definition. Reminds me of R1 images. Just gone through some of my son's R1 Jpeg images from 2009 taking them through LR3. Amazing camera/lens but rubbish EVF and impossible buffer 1-2 shots before indigestion set in. Did you use the 18-70 or 18-55 kit lens. Looks sharp for 18-70 version. You must have got a good copy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests