Page 2 of 2

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:59 pm
by kingfisher
thanks david and yildiz

the detailphoto`s , is piece off the normal picture

dr harout ask me , for some 100% crop-picture , i thought he means a small part off the picture
butt i ask my friend what he`s meaning
now i now...... al the photo`s , except the detail-picture`s are 100 % cropt photo`s

so i make them for the forum only smaller

when i take this picture`s , i make my sharppoint in the camera out off the middle , so the compositie is in one time good

david
thank you for you`s compliment`s
i send some off the picture to paul genge , hope he like them

greatings
gustav

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:34 pm
by Dr. Harout
That's OK, Gustav.
100% crop = a small part of the picture (up to 1024 pix on one side) without resizing.
Anyway, in the detailed shot I see a perfect sharpness and that's what I was expecting from that lens. Beautiful!
Thanks a lot, Gustav, you are wonderful. :D

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:37 pm
by kingfisher
hello bossel

i like , that you ask me

when i take this picture`s at 2.8 , 3.2 or 4 the shutterspeed is going faster , so that is good

but the place that is sharp on the picture get smaller , so that means , that the kingfisher has a lot off on-sharpness

if you take this picture`s at two or three meter`s distance , the best depth of field is 5,6 or 6.3 ,
when you take 7.1 or 8 the possibility gets higher that you get restless background

the ideal ISO for the SONY A700 is 200

next sunday i go back to the kingfishers , hopefully with the sony 300 MM , i hire this lens
i hope that someday i have this lens for myself , it is a very great lens , i think the best 300MM THERE IS
only the price here in holland is to much , 5150 pound , in the UK he cost 3600 pound , why the difference
i now that the POUND is going down ( sorry ) but the different , between the price in the netherlands en the UK is to much ( almost 1700 POUNDS )

i think that sony must give everyone on this forum this lens , for making free advertisement :D :D :D :lol: :lol:

greatings
gustav

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 9:17 pm
by David Kilpatrick
kingfisher wrote: i send some off the picture to paul genge , hope he like them

greatings
gustav
Paul has already mentioned your photos to me, he was very impressed.

David

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 10:33 pm
by paulmurphy
Stunning pictures of a magnificent subject, a real pleasure to view.

Best wishes

Murph

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 2:46 am
by Greg Beetham
I'm with Gustav,
mathimatically speaking if you crop something by 100% you have ZERO left over......What would be a better term would be something like 90% crop.......maybe.
Greg

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:11 am
by Greg Beetham
Sonolta wrote:
Greg Beetham wrote:I'm with Gustav,
mathimatically speaking if you crop something by 100% you have ZERO left over......What would be a better term would be something like 90% crop.......maybe.
Greg
It's called a 100% crop because it is a crop that contains 100% of the pixels. :roll: :idea:

-Sonolta

PS...You are among the kings of these birds, no doubt about it, kingfisher.
You bet, really excellent stuff, I'd love to have the Australian bird index shot at that quality....might take a few lifetimes though. :(

When I first saw this term (over at DPR a long time ago) I asked then what they meant by cropping a photo by 100% (a paradox), and no one could explain it to me, now that you explain it Don, it's making some sort of sense....at last.

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 5:07 pm
by jcoffin
Greg Beetham wrote: When I first saw this term (over at DPR a long time ago) I asked then what they meant by cropping a photo by 100% (a paradox), and no one could explain it to me, now that you explain it Don, it's making some sort of sense....at last.
It's the photo at 100% magnification, cropped to a size that allows posting.

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 5:55 pm
by MFS
They're stunning as usual Gustav and I agree with you about the 300mm give-away. What is 300mm in a lifetime length anyway? Cheers, John

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 11:15 pm
by Birma
Really lovely shots Gustav. Even the branch / perch that the bird is sitting on is in beautiful detail. After I have finished enjoying the glorious plummage, I can then wonder at the moss and lichen. A great Christmas gift to us all at Photoclubalpha :D

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:46 am
by stevecim
Top Shots, Gustav

I've only seen kingfishers twice in the wild, never close enough to take a usable photo, even with a 500mm lens I was still to far away to get any detail at all :(

How far was kingfisher from you?

Cheers, Stephen

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 7:03 am
by stevecim
thanks Don :)

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:57 pm
by fastson
Wonderful shots. Such detail. :shock:

Re: some new kingfisherpicture`s

Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:31 pm
by kingfisher
-Sonolta

PS...You are among the kings of these birds, no doubt about it, kingfisher.[/quote]


thanks don

gustav