Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
sury wrote:The contrast between the first and second is quite jarring. I am afraid what we will
see as time progresses is the second one and lose the ubiquitous Cuba captured in
the first one, once US and Cuba relations thaw.
Very nice captured Valery. Shows a snippet of life on that plaza with various people in different activities.
I know the perspective is such but the even railing would have been a tad less distracting.
sury wrote:Very nice captured Valery. Shows a snippet of life on that plaza with various people in different activities.
I know the perspective is such but the even railing would have been a tad less distracting.
Sury
Thank you Sury!
I left the railing to show what a small square in the heart of the historic city.
More shots from Cuba : https://plus.google.com/+ValeryDyck_RW/ ... R7ruqardrD
Actually, the link under the picture works too.
Valery,
That was a nice album on Cuba. My comment was not about removing the rail but leveling it across the photo. The rail itself
is not a distraction.
sury wrote:Valery,
That was a nice album on Cuba. My comment was not about removing the rail but leveling it across the photo. The rail itself is not a distraction.
Sury
Hi Sury,
Perhaps I misunderstand your comment, but it seems to me that because the image was not taken perpendicular to the line of the rail, if the image is cropped at an angle to make the rail horizontal, the buildings and people will be tilted.
Tom,
You did understand my comment correctly Tom. I do understand it was all about perspective as I mentioned in my post.
I was just mentioning the angular perspective (which is inevitable from the angle of view) is tad distracting to me.
I had no intentions of taking anything away from the shot - the liveliness of the plaza.
