Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

For a moment there Henry I thought you were on a ghost ship, because I knew the USS Lexington (CV-2) was lost in the battle of the Coral Sea 08-05-1942 (not in vain though).
I did a little checking and she was replaced in a short time (16-06-1942) by renaming the not yet finished USS Cabot as USS Lexington (CV-16) and when later deployed in action did the name proud, as usual right in the middle of the heaviest action to be had, Tokyo radio claimed her destroyed separately twice after numerous hits and kamikaze attacks, but she survived it all and is now the museum ship you were on.
Greg
Ps boy talk about a futile artistic endeavour with the rock art, when the tide comes in the waves are going to wreck all that fine balancing work in no time. :roll:
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Birma »

Those night scenes are great Henry - lovely colours and reflections.
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

Greg Beetham wrote:For a moment there Henry I thought you were on a ghost ship, because I knew the USS Lexington (CV-2) was lost in the battle of the Coral Sea 08-05-1942 (not in vain though).
I did a little checking and she was replaced in a short time (16-06-1942) by renaming the not yet finished USS Cabot as USS Lexington (CV-16) and when later deployed in action did the name proud, as usual right in the middle of the heaviest action to be had, Tokyo radio claimed her destroyed separately twice after numerous hits and kamikaze attacks, but she survived it all and is now the museum ship you were on.
A couple of weeks ago we spent the weekend in Corpus Christi. Old friends from California were there for a few days so we drove over to spend the weekend with them since it has been several years since we had been able to see each other. Two of us wanted to visit the USS Lexington so we spent a few hours there. I have more photos of the ship in the Texas gallery:

http://www.bakubo.com/Galleries%202/index.html

In 2000 I also visited the WWII USS Yorktown CV-10 aircraft carrier in Charleston, South Carolina and the USS Alabama BB-60 battleship in Mobile, Alabama. One of these days I want to visit the WWI and WWII USS Texas BB-35 battleship in Houston, Texas.
Greg Beetham wrote: Ps boy talk about a futile artistic endeavour with the rock art, when the tide comes in the waves are going to wreck all that fine balancing work in no time. :roll:
Yes, it is transient, but it gives him something to do everyday. :lol:
Last edited by bakubo on Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

Birma wrote:I saw tumble weed mentioned in a wildlife programme the other night. Apparently it is a real pest in some places, and I was amazed to hear that it is not originally from America! http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01nw28w
I saw this on the TV news this afternoon about tumbleweeds invading Clovis, New Mexico on Sunday. See the video:

http://www.texomashomepage.com/story/d/ ... 9kfa4RtWRw
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

Some may be wondering why I started this tiny sensor photo thread a long time ago. It is just meant as a reminder to us all that you don't necessarily need a big sensor (what is a big sensor changes over time -- when this thread started I was mostly talking about an APS-C sensor or even a 4/3 sensor) or the best of the best. I thought I would mention all of this as a reminder and I just saw this short essay that put it at the fore of my mind again:

Small Format Professionalism

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.co ... alism.html

While we are at it, here is another good essay from awhile back:

On the Sharpness of Lenses

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.co ... enses.html
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

bakubo wrote:
A couple of weeks ago we spent the weekend in Corpus Christi. Old friends from California were there for a few days so we drove over to spend the weekend with them since it has been several years since we had been able to see each other. Two of us wanted to visit the USS Lexington so we spent a few hours there. I have more photos of the ship in the Texas gallery:

http://www.bakubo.com/Galleries%202/index.html

In 2000 I also visited the WWII USS Yorktown CV-10 aircraft carrier in Charleston, South Carolina and the USS Alabama BB-60 battleship in Mobile, Alabama. One of these days I want to visit the WWI and WWII USS Texas BB-35 in Houston, Texas.
That all sounds like something I would like to do Henry, my brother has been to the Arizona memorial in Perl Harbour and also visited USS Missouri (BB-63); he said it was an experience not to be missed.
The Yorktown is another famous name and (CV-10) is also a replacement of the original, (from referring to Wiki, I knew the name from past readings of the Pacific action but had forgotten some of the details). The USS Yorktown (CV-5) was in the Coral Sea battle with Lexington and was badly damaged as well at that time, she was an aircraft carrier that went down fighting, this time at the later battle of Midway, well, went down the next day from heavy battle damage and additionally being hit by more torpedoes from a Japanese sub while a sitting target, along with the attending destroyer USS Hammann.
The carriers USS Enterprise and USS Hornet (Hornet lost most of her planes in the following action) were also in the Midway battle, (they had previously been busy with the Doolittle raid) planes from the Enterprise sank two Japanese carriers, and a mix of planes from the Yorktown sank another, the Yorktown sank one more before she was knocked out of action herself.
USS Saratoga had not yet returned from a refit, (she had been torpedoed trying to save Wake Is. but survived) some of her planes and crew were part of the action operating from the Yorktown.
The carrier USS Hornet (CV-8) was lost a short time later in the Solomon Is. battle and later replaced with USS Hornet (CV-12) previously named USS Kearsarge.
USS Yorktown (CV-10) also had an illustrious WWII career but I haven’t finished reading and refreshing my memory about her exploits.
Greg
Ps some great shots of CV-16 there in the Corpus Christi section H.
Pps I liked the links, those tumbleweeds are a real pest, dangerous too if they stack up against a house and catch on fire by damaging the electrical connection.
Lots of common sense in the Online Photographer posts, the only thing I think FF does well (in defense of larger formats) is wide angle, ok ok make that, it ‘potentially’ can do wide angle better IF you have the lenses that can perform on such a large area sensor.
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Birma »

bakubo wrote:
Birma wrote:I saw tumble weed mentioned in a wildlife programme the other night. Apparently it is a real pest in some places, and I was amazed to hear that it is not originally from America! http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01nw28w
I saw this on the TV news this afternoon about tumbleweeds invading Clovis, New Mexico on Sunday. See the video:

http://www.texomashomepage.com/story/d/ ... 9kfa4RtWRw
Good spot Henry :) . Having to sweep up leaves in the winter is bad enough. Glad we don't have these filling up our backyard!
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

Thanks for all the cool info! I have read some of it in the past, but didn't remember all those details. By the way, in the Corpus Christi gallery did you see the photo that shows the side of the ship and the sign that indicates where a Japanese kamikaze hit?
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

Birma wrote:Good spot Henry :) . Having to sweep up leaves in the winter is bad enough. Glad we don't have these filling up our backyard!
I bet if you left them there for awhile they would be a hiding place for rats and snakes too. Got to get rid of them.

Here are snowy day photos in Vancouver taken with the old 2.1mp Olympus D-510Z:

Image

Image
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

bakubo wrote:Thanks for all the cool info! I have read some of it in the past, but didn't remember all those details. By the way, in the Corpus Christi gallery did you see the photo that shows the side of the ship and the sign that indicates where a Japanese kamikaze hit?
Yes Henry I even put my reading glasses on to read the sign about the Kamikaze attack, the pilot sure caused some carnage, that made me remember reading about the WWII photo I saw of a Kamikaze plane just before the impact on BB-63 I think it was, it even left a dent in the armour plating on the side and it’s been there ever since, they also discovered the remains of the pilot at the time in some wreckage against the side of the superstructure further along the deck and gave him a military burial at sea.

Some odd things happen in battle, I was reading up on the Battle of Midway and there were apparently two occasions where three Japanese planes joined the landing circuit around the Yorktown (wheels down, flaps extended kind of thing) thinking they were landing on their own carrier (they had probably covered an attack on the Enterprise or Hornet and were on their way back short of fuel flying into the sun). The AAA boys encouraged them to take a hike, they even shot one down, thpoilsports, they should have let them land, scratch six enemy planes without firing a shot.
Greg
User avatar
Cogito
Grand Caliph
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:41 pm
Location: Chatteris, Cambridgeshire.

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Cogito »

bakubo wrote:Here are snowy day photos in Vancouver taken with the old 2.1mp Olympus D-510Z:
The first one - JUST MY TYPE OF IMAGE! - I love it.
And seeing how this thread is progressing, I made a number of comments a page back......
Tony
Be you ever so high, the law is above you. Lord Denning
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

Cogito wrote:I'm still not sure why I ever discarded my old cameras. I replaced a Minolta 7Hi with a Leica Digilux 2 and am not sure if I gained anything although the D2 is perhaps the best compact I've owned. But it doesn't have the lens range of the 7Hi. And then I bought a Minolta 7D to replace my film camera. O.K. not a replacement - more a method of using existing lenses. But now I've gone the "Ooh, let's upgrade" route and have ended up with a Sony A57. No complaints but on reflection, WHY? I don't print at > A4 paper size. I don't shoot videos. I don't often need to bracket shots.... I suppose "live view" is really quite nice and I appreciate the fully articulated lcd. But I've never shot at faster than ISO 800 so....
I have been quite happy with all the various digital cameras (DSLRs and digicams) I have used and upgraded for the last 14 years. The DSLRs are more flexible, are more responsive, and do give better results, but I look at my digicam photos and am pretty satisfied with them too. For the first time in these last 14 years I have been pretty content to not upgrade for awhile. My Olympus E-M5 and Panasonic G3 are approaching 2 years since I got them. One of these days there will be something that really tempts me, but I am happy that even with the new E-M1 and E-M10 I am content to just keep using the E-M5 for awhile longer. Olympus this week came out with a version 2.0 firmware for it so that is nice to see they are still adding new features to it and it is not forgotten.

Back when I shot film I used a 35mm SLR, but I also always had something smaller to carry around when I didn't want to have the SLR. I bought an Olympus XA in 1981, Olympus Infinity Twin in 1990, an Olympus µ or mju (Japanese name, in U.S. named Stylus) in 1992, and an Olympus Stylus Epic in 1998. Small cameras without zooms, but using the same 35mm film. By the way, notice that Olympus was using Greek letters for cameras before Sony. :lol: You can get a µ or an α. Sadly, I didn't keep the XA, µ, or Stylus Epic with me all the time. They were quite small and light and I should have. :( Since starting with digital I have used various DSLRs, but try to have a digicam of some sort with me almost all the time.

In your case, the A57 is certainly more responsive and flexible than your 7Hi. Personally, I always evaluate my own uses for a camera before deciding whether to buy or not. I try not to let myself get caught up in all the hype and excitement you always see when a new camera comes along. I suggest you carefully think about what you like to shoot and how you like to shoot. You may decide something smaller and lighter, even if it has a smaller sensor, is better for you. There is quite a range of cameras. The new Sony RX10 has a good sized sensor (same as RX100II) along with a wonderful 24-200mm f2.8 equivalent lens. There are also lots of smaller sensor cameras with nice zoom lenses made by Panasonic, Canon, Sony, etc. If you don't need an extensive zoom range there are even more choices. With a VF (usually EVF) or not. Many can shoot raw (my Canon S95 and Canon G15 can) and that goes a long way to improving the results even more. As they say, the camera you have with you is always better than the camera that is left at home. :)
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

Smokey Bear! This was last week in Arizona with the Canon S95. I hadn't seen a Smokey Bear for many years, but either he is back or maybe never left.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smokey_Bear

Image
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

I've seen that one of the yacht club? before H, it's still good though, very wintery looking, the tree as well. Yeah wildfires are not funny at all, it sure pays to put that campfire out properly when leaving.
Greg
User avatar
bakubo
Tower of Babel
Posts: 5875
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: Tiny sensor revenge gallery thread!

Unread post by bakubo »

They say what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Well, it looks like in the Mojave Desert around Las Vegas that sometimes your underwear also stays in Vegas. :lol: Especially, if you go to the desert at night with someone you just met and are drunk. :lol: Canon G15 today.

Image
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests