Birds 2012
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
Re: Birds 2012
Love the color Rob. All I got here is sparrows and barn swallows. Not much for color this time of year.
A65 16mm-50mm 2.8
Tamron 72E 90mm 2.8 Macro
Sony 35mm 1.8 Sony
Sony 55-300mm and 55-200mm
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Tamron 72E 90mm 2.8 Macro
Sony 35mm 1.8 Sony
Sony 55-300mm and 55-200mm
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
- Dusty
- Emperor of a Minor Galaxy
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:04 pm
- Location: Ironton, Missouri, USA
Re: Birds 2012
Robbie, he looks like a conductor ready to start up the orchestra! Great shot!
Dusty
Dusty
An a700, an a550 and couple of a580s, plus even more lenses (Zeiss included!).
Re: Birds 2012
Just, wow!
I had forgotten how good you were at catching the very special poses with birds, Robbie.
Thanks for sharing.
Yildiz
I had forgotten how good you were at catching the very special poses with birds, Robbie.
Thanks for sharing.
Yildiz
Re: Birds 2012
Another quick one from yesterday
Re: Birds 2012
mvanrheenen wrote:Is that some kind of Grey Shrike, Robbie?
It's a Redbacked Shrike..
- Dr. Harout
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5662
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
- Location: Yerevan, Armenia
- Contact:
Re: Birds 2012
Robbie, the EXIF says 300/2.8 lens, and yet mentions the focal length separately as 500mm... so, which lens for this superb shot?
Re: Birds 2012
Close enough.RobbieA wrote:mvanrheenen wrote:Is that some kind of Grey Shrike, Robbie?
It's a Redbacked Shrike..
Great image!
Re: Birds 2012
This was shot with the 500F4... I have noticed that the exif sometimes says 300/2.8.... maybe something to do with lens profiles in ACR...Dr. Harout wrote:Robbie, the EXIF says 300/2.8 lens, and yet mentions the focal length separately as 500mm... so, which lens for this superb shot?
- Greg Beetham
- Tower of Babel
- Posts: 6117
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
- Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
- Contact:
Re: Birds 2012
Some truly remarkable bird shots you guys, amazing stuff.
Greg
Greg
Re: Birds 2012
I shot this in pretty low light this morning at ISO1000 with the A99.. I was quite happy with the result..
Re: Birds 2012
Another one at ISO 1000
- sury
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Birds 2012
In my case, I would be ecstatic. Yet another thoroughly enjoyable set Robbie.RobbieA wrote:I shot this in pretty low light this morning at ISO1000 with the A99.. I was quite happy with the result..
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests