Page 1 of 1
Is It Time to Repeal the 3 Image Rule
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:12 pm
by jbtaylor
David,
I think we have proven that we can handle the responsibility.
Anyone else have any thoughts on the matter?
Re: Is It Time to Repeal the 3 Image Rule
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:56 pm
by pakodominguez
a.- limitation is 3 images by post -you can submit many post in one thread.
b.- photoclubalpha.com have a gallery that we can use for showing pictures
http://www.photoclubalpha.com/coppermine
Regards
Re: Is It Time to Repeal the 3 Image Rule
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:09 am
by Lonnie Utah
I vote YES! That, or repeal the 60 seconds between posts rule....
Re: Is It Time to Repeal the 3 Image Rule
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:28 am
by Dusty
I vote no. Too many pic in a single post makes it hard to keep track of things. There may also be limits in the BBS software of how big a single post can be.
Dusty
Re: Is It Time to Repeal the 3 Image Rule
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:47 am
by Greg Beetham
That was brought in because Don was in the habit of suddenly posting about 23 cat photos...again. So we probably don't need it so much any more I guess.
Greg
ps Oh yeah I agree about the re-posting rule that is a real pest if you are in a hurry.
Re: Is It Time to Repeal the 3 Image Rule
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:08 am
by David Kilpatrick
The rule is not aimed at members, it's aimed at the possibility of massive spam invasion - for example, flooding the board with pre-written porno spam - I've seen it happen (one of my sites was hit).
A site which has a limit on images (actually, I have increased this to four but not said anything) and on flood timing simply doesn't work for the worst spam sources so they don't bother.
David
Re: Is It Time to Repeal the 3 Image Rule
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:12 am
by jbtaylor
Good stuff.
Thanks for your hospitality David.
JT