one for sury

Show everyone the latest shots which make you feel dead chuffed with your camera choice
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
mikehawthorne
Grand Caliph
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:41 am

one for sury

Unread post by mikehawthorne »

hi Sury
i promised i would upload original image of Yosemite for you to adjust it is straight from scanner with no adjustment done.
Attachments
yosomite.jpg
(150.55 KiB) Downloaded 2010 times
yosomite.jpg
(150.55 KiB) Downloaded 2010 times
MickH
Initiate
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:11 am

Re: one for sury

Unread post by MickH »

Good morning Grand Caliph. :D

Am I missing something or have you posted the same image twice?

MickH
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: one for sury

Unread post by sury »

Mick,
Here is the post Polaroid scratch and dust removal and a bw treatment of the same. It took all 1 sec for
the Polaroid filter and I leave it to you to judge if it worked since you know what to look for, in the image.
I certainly see a white spot go away and the foreground tree to the left has been improved.

Image

B&W treatment
Image
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
MickH
Initiate
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:11 am

Re: one for sury

Unread post by MickH »

Hi Sury,

I can see what you have done and agree that there's an improvement. I can also see (obviously) that your second file is in mono. Am I missing something because Mike's original two files look identical to me.

Sorry if I'm being blind or dumb!

MickH
mikehawthorne
Grand Caliph
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:41 am

Re: one for sury

Unread post by mikehawthorne »

hello Sury
i can see improvement and i do like the mono version best as there was too much blue and green dominating the original image.
and yes MickH there are two the same and no you are not dumb or blind, i had got up early and uploaded while not quite awake, i should have had my cup of char first, all the best.

Mike Hawthorne
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: one for sury

Unread post by sury »

I think I should have stopped after the second drink last night. :lol:
I should have addressed my reply to Mike. My apologies. I thought the
same image was posted twice so I took the first one, fixed the scratches
and removed dust using the Polaroid filter, saved it and then proceeded
with a B&W treatment. On the B&W treatment, I did not simply desaturate
the image but took the red channel version. I felt that one was better.
Hope it helps clear the confusion, MikeH and MickH. :D
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
mikehawthorne
Grand Caliph
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:41 am

Re: one for sury

Unread post by mikehawthorne »

thanks Sury
good night or good morning, going to bed gave up on scanner for the night.

al the best mike hawthorne
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: one for sury

Unread post by sury »

Mike,
Before I flog this one dead, I thought I give it one more try and worked on the color one
and the B&W version of the color. I did PWL (painting with light) to improve shadows and highlights,
removed "haze", boosted the image. It was fun and did not take any time at all. :D

With best regards,
Sury

Image

Image
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Birma
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6585
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: one for sury

Unread post by Birma »

Looking good Sury :) I think the last colour one is my fav so far.
Nex 5, Nex 6 (IR), A7M2, A99 and a bunch of lenses.
mikehawthorne
Grand Caliph
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:41 am

Re: one for sury

Unread post by mikehawthorne »

hi Sury
seen and approved.
mike hawthorne
mikehawthorne
Grand Caliph
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:41 am

Re: one for sury

Unread post by mikehawthorne »

hi Sury
seen and approved.
mike hawthorne
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: one for sury

Unread post by sury »

Mike,
You may want to get that Polaroid utility. That works under Photoshop too as a filter.
Best of all it is free. :D

With best regards,
Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
User avatar
Dr. Harout
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5662
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Yerevan, Armenia
Contact:

Re: one for sury

Unread post by Dr. Harout »

sury wrote:Mike,
You may want to get that Polaroid utility. That works under Photoshop too as a filter.
Best of all it is free. :D

With best regards,
Sury
Sury, could you give me a link, I'm having trouble finding it (in fact it's bringing something totally different from what you're describing).
A99 + a7rII + Sony, Zeiss, Minolta, Rokinon and M42 lenses

Flickr
User avatar
sury
Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
Posts: 5419
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:58 am
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Contact:

Re: one for sury

Unread post by sury »

Doc,
Looks like Polaroid does not have it on its site.
Try this one and see. If not, I may have the installer (I lost quite a bit when my old computer died a year ago.)

http://polaroid-dust-scratch-removal-so ... ownloading

Sury
Minimize avoidable sufferings - Sir Karl Popper
mikehawthorne
Grand Caliph
Posts: 421
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:41 am

Re: one for sury

Unread post by mikehawthorne »

hi sury
i did find it and installed as plug in, by the way i had chat with local processer shop they do not scan slides or negs with normal scanners but use a mask? and insert it in their machine. i had some slides done and they had no noise or no grain, i am thinking that perhaps my epson perfection v500 might be creating digital noise, i suppose it is just a form of digital camera after all.

any way thanks sury for the good dialogue.
mike hawthorne
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests