Photoclubalpha

I wonder how often you pop in? Noticed myself that sometimes I feel I check too often - looking for news, see what others report, look at pictures, participate in the latest rumours and gossip. Myself I'd vote 2-5 times per day, if possible, though it depends on my workload. I often skip lunch or work on my email from home so I don't feel guilty (well, a tiny bit ) if I sometimes I take 2 minutes to check a photo site from work...

It becomes a bit disappointing to receive zero responses to whatever

Obviously, the more frequent end of the bell curve will fill up faster, but I'm proud to say I was the first to admit my addiction.

I'm not sure if I qualify as a once per day'er, or a constantly...I turn on the computer at night (re-awaken) and the forum tab is still there so I might actually be an addict without knowing it....I might have to see someone about it...
Greg

OK, I admit I'm addicted to the forum, except for some times when too busy to get near a computer.

This was a bit of a challenge to answer as it is my favourite photo forum, and when the atmosphere is good (which is most of the time) I enjoy visiting often.

Sadly, on occasion, the atmosphere is not good and I have better things to do with my time.

But, in my seventh decade and been round the block, and the world a few times, hey life is like that

Well, it seems we're pretty active here! Based on 24 answers, around 60% of us pop in more than once a day, less than 20% only a few times per week.

Nobody comes along just once a week or less (or these are those who didn't notice the poll )

bonneville wrote:Sadly, on occasion, the atmosphere is not good and I have better things to do with my time.

deja vu?

(I hope bossel will correct my use of the phrase if its wrong, but the meaning should be clear following yesterday's fiasco)

bonneville wrote:deja vu? ... I hope bossel will correct my use of the phrase ...

No need for correction. You say it and I agree. Well, I could add some accents, like déjà vu, but eevn wtih liltte eorrs evyorebdy ûndèrständs!

bossel wrote:eevn wtih liltte eorrs evyorebdy ûndèrständs!

Good one, Bossel! I suppose you heard about that study revealing that only the first and last letters need to be in place for somebody to read a written word in context.