David Kilpatrick wrote:Of course I had the 60D while also using the A55, so the Silent Mode didn't impress (it is the same as earlier Canon models) - NEX and A55 have got me used to cameras where no-one notices you are taking pix.
Yes, an SLT is going to be quieter than the quietest SLR since an SLT doesn't have a moving mirror. The 60D is quieter than the 30D I had before though. The 60D has Silent mode 1, Silent mode 2, and off. I have it set to Silent mode 1. I haven't tried turning it off to see what it sounds like when it is turned off.
David Kilpatrick wrote:
The 60D is a Minoltafied Canon, where the controls have been moved to the Minolta-Sony position (on off switch) familiar from the A700 and the stupid on/off/wheel unlock switch of past Canons has been replaced by a soft-action button to lock or unlock the rear controller for EV compensation. Canon still don't bother to mark, on the camera, where this function is.
Yes, Canon has moved the on/off switch. I had no problem with the 30D location and I have no problem with the 60D location. The A55 and A580 or Nikonified Sony cameras with their new on/off switch location. Personally, I never had any trouble with the old exposure compensation lock and unlock lever and no problem with the new exposure compensation lock and unlock button. Both seem to work fine. My 60D has the button marked so I am a bit confused unless the ones sold in the UK leave it unmarked.
David Kilpatrick wrote:
My overall feelings were that it is a huge camera for what you get, and indeed, this was cited by one upgrader as a reason for buying it - they said that they did not want the 550D because 'it isn't any bigger than the one I've got' and went for the 60D instead. And it's actually heavier than the 7D, not lighter, because of the steel/plastic construction instead of mag alloy.
I don't understand this. As you can see the 60D is almost identical in size to the A700, but the 60D is a bit lighter. The 60D is smaller and much lighter than the Canon 7D. I have looked at both at the same time. Believe me, the 7D looks and feels a lot bigger than the 60D. It is also smaller and lighter than the 50D. Again, the 60D is pretty much the same as the A700.
60D:
755g
145 x 106 x 79mm
7D:
820g
148 x 111 x 74mm
50D:
822g
146 x 108 x 74mm
A700:
768g
142 x 105 x 80mm
A900:
895g
156 x 117 x 82mm
David Kilpatrick wrote:
Excellent screen but the camera can get quite confused about image orientation, it's the only camera I have used where after setting up a macro shot I ended up with the image upside-down on the screen and had to tweak the position to get it to flip to normal.
So far, I have not seen it get confused. To be fair, though every time I tilted/swiveled my A700 LCD I didn't notice it get confused either.
David Kilpatrick wrote:
The best innovation in the 60D is in the video audio control - 64 steps of manual mic/input gain with a digital stereo dB indicator to show sound level and clipping zone. But the built-in mic is about the worst I've come across for wind noise; they also provide (maybe because of this) a separate wind noise reduction setting which cuts a frequency band associated with this mic and wind.
I haven't tried video and don't expect to use it. I don't care about video in a DSLR. I suspect anyone who really cares about video will be using a separate microphone, especially since video doesn't have AF (I think 60D doesn't have video AF).
David Kilpatrick wrote:
The focusing is actually better than the 7D because the simpler module in the 60D is less prone to picking irrelevant foreground detail when you use sports/action wide area. For all other purposes, I found the central spot to be the only choice to use; there is still the issue of Canon's 'foreground priority whenever you use wider zone focus.
For all my DSLRs I always use just the central point. What is really nice though is that it can AF at wide angle. My KM 7D, Sony A700, and Sony A100 couldn't do it reliably. Most of the time they get the focus wrong. So far, I haven't had any problems with the 60D, but to be frank I didn't have problems with the 30D and 300D either.
David Kilpatrick wrote:
Image quality I would rate one or two notches below the A55, it's considerably more noisy even at low ISO and has a kind of slightly soft-grainy look by comparison (same applies to 7D or 550D, the sensor has 40% more pixels per square millimetre than the Sony 16MP).
I can't comment much about this since 1) I don't have an A55 and 2) I just shoot and see if it looks okay without doing the kinds of extremely critical comparisons that the review sites do. From what I have seen in reviews and my own shooting though everything looks good. One thing I have noticed though is that the well-known red channel noise problem with the A700 that shows up as very noisy, mottled skies hasn't reared its ugly head with the 60D (or 30D and 300D before that). With my A700 the problem can be really terrible when converting to B&W.
David Kilpatrick wrote:
Someone suggested that if Canon could make 18MP APS-C, they could make 35MP full frame. Actually, if the same density was used on full frame, you would get a 45 megapixel sensor; if you expanded the Sony 16MP sensor to full frame, it would be 36 megapixels.
Whew, that's a lot of pixels. Maybe need to design new lenses to take advantage of it?
David Kilpatrick wrote:
It's a very good camera Henry especially if you like bigger bodies for handling.
The size is almost exactly the same as the A700, but a bit lighter than the A700. So far, I haven't found any of the bugs and rough edges that the A700 has. No IBIS though. The situation has changed a bit though in the last 3-4 years because now there are a lot more ILIS lenses available. The downside is that some Canon consumer lenses are a bit bigger than some A-mount consumer lenses -- because of the in-lens motor, I guess. When you get to the high end lenses though, I think, they are pretty much the same size.
So far, my evaluation is the 60D is an extremely well sorted out camera. I will only know after a lot more use whether it has QC problems, but I am encouraged by remembering that my 30D and 300D didn't have any and never gave me a moment's grief. The same can be said about all my Minolta, Olympus, etc. cameras, but I have had a long, sad experience with all my Sony and KM cameras.