http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journ ... nge-camera
I thought it was an interesting read
DK's Canon 60d review
- bfitzgerald
- Subsuming Vortex of Brilliance
- Posts: 3996
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:48 pm
Re: DK's Canon 60d review
Thanks for posting.
The 60D is heavier than the magnesium-body 7D, despite being the first to have a plastic skin and metal skeleton body in this series since the D60 of 2002.
7D: 820g / 28.9 oz. (body only)
60D: 675g / 23.8 oz (body only)
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/ ... ifications
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/ ... ifications
The 60D is heavier than the magnesium-body 7D, despite being the first to have a plastic skin and metal skeleton body in this series since the D60 of 2002.
7D: 820g / 28.9 oz. (body only)
60D: 675g / 23.8 oz (body only)
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/ ... ifications
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/ ... ifications
Bakubo http://www.bakubo.com
-
David Kilpatrick
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
- Location: Kelso, Scotland
- Contact:
Re: DK's Canon 60d review
They have not corrected that - it actually was supposed to refer to the magnesium-bodied 50D, not the 7D. I can't remember now whether the correction got into print, or was made in a subsequent article, or a letter reply in the magazine.
The comparison of weights was between the same series, 50D to 60D, and for some reason I typed 7D because this had been discussed in the article.
David
The comparison of weights was between the same series, 50D to 60D, and for some reason I typed 7D because this had been discussed in the article.
David
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests
