Tamron 55-200mm/Sony 55-200mm DT - a sleeper!

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
User avatar
Fotogeorge
Heirophant
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 6:38 pm
Location: Southern California USA
Contact:

Re: Tamron 55-200mm/Sony 55-200mm DT - a sleeper!

Unread post by Fotogeorge »

Javelin wrote:your mostly describing the beercan there. is the wide end being 50mm important to you?

The wide end isn't important to me for closeup shots. I want good closeup magnification in the the tele-end. I prefer a 24-70 in the wide end. I don't shoot many extreme wide angle landscapes. The beercan is a lot different from what I imagine ( I have a feeling) Sony may bring out in a future F4 zoom lens. I've never used the beercan, but from what I have read, it doesn't have internal focus, a non-rotating front element, or interior construction coated for digital. I need a lens with internal focus, so I can use filters. I also need internal focus with my Metz macro flash, so I won't be limited to manual focus. I don't always need a dedicated macro lens; a good closeup lens does just fine. I believe the Sony 55-200mm lenses all have a rotating front element. Presently, my irreplaceable, KM 28-75 F/2.8 lens is ideal, but I'd rather not take it out in some field conditions. The Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC is a good alternative, because it has many of my requirements, including a mag ratio of 1:2.3, affordable, and lighter weight, but it lacks a long reach. Sometimes I just need a longer tele-end. I guess there is no perfect zoom lens for me.
KM7D, Sony A350, A580, A-700, A57, A65, A5100 , a6500 , & a7iii, plus a bunch of lenses.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests