Image compression difference with teleconverter ... ?
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 1:41 pm
Hello,
I was thinking about that in the Traffic to go to work (Montreal city is not easy to reach when you are working downtown and you need to be there in car ) of the difference of image compression from a Tele zoom focal lenght and the equivalent with a smaller zoom with a teleconverter.
Here is my point :
If I'm using a 400mm F/5.6 lens, and I'm focusing on a subject like at 20 meter with some elements in front and on the back of it, do i will get the same exact compression for the element in front and back or the subject if I'm using a 200mm F/2.8 with a 2x teleconverter . I'm thinking of a YES answer ... , but I'm just not sure at 100%. (in this example The camera is always at the same position from the subject).
I know that this is not like doing comparison between APS and Full frame like 300mm on FF and 200mm on APS because the subject distance will not be the same on different sensor size.
Thank you in advance,
Regards,
Frank
I was thinking about that in the Traffic to go to work (Montreal city is not easy to reach when you are working downtown and you need to be there in car ) of the difference of image compression from a Tele zoom focal lenght and the equivalent with a smaller zoom with a teleconverter.
Here is my point :
If I'm using a 400mm F/5.6 lens, and I'm focusing on a subject like at 20 meter with some elements in front and on the back of it, do i will get the same exact compression for the element in front and back or the subject if I'm using a 200mm F/2.8 with a 2x teleconverter . I'm thinking of a YES answer ... , but I'm just not sure at 100%. (in this example The camera is always at the same position from the subject).
I know that this is not like doing comparison between APS and Full frame like 300mm on FF and 200mm on APS because the subject distance will not be the same on different sensor size.
Thank you in advance,
Regards,
Frank