The ultimate focus test?

Discussion of lenses, brand or independent, uses and merits
Forum rules
No more than three images or three external links allowed in any post or reply. Please trim quotations and do not include images in quotes unless essential.
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

The ultimate focus test?

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

I tried focusing on a distant swarm of midges in the last rays of the sun in the churchyard with the 70-200mm HSM on the A900. Guess what? It locked on no problem.

Image

May not look like much but here's a 100% clip:

Image

That is at ISO 320 - I have no worries about using ISO 320 routinely. Midge in the middle clearly focused, sharp, body resolved at f/4 and 200mm - only 1/160th shutter speed, really these bugs need 1/1000th or shorter to freeze their movement.

David
01af
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 2:44 pm
Location: Germany

Re: The ultimate focus test?

Unread post by 01af »

David Kilpatrick wrote:That is at ISO 320 - I have no worries about using ISO 320 routinely.
What is this "ISO 320" thing about? I keep reading about it a lot lately but I'm afraid I don't fully understand.

I do understand that in the Alpha 900 at ISO 320/26°, noise is significantly lower than at ISO 400/27°. So I have now developed the habit of using ISO 640/29°, ISO 320/26°, and ISO 160/23° rather than ISO 800/30°, ISO 400/27°, or ISO 200/24°. I do not understand, however, why people are so keen on using ISO 320/26° specifically. While noise is lower than at ISO 400/27°, it still is higher than at ISO 160/23° or ISO 100/21°.

So when shooting hand-held telephoto lenses, ISO 320/26° sure is a sensible setting to use. But when I don't need that speed I always try to select lower speeds, as conditions permit. Am I missing something?

-- Olaf
David Kilpatrick
Site Admin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Kelso, Scotland
Contact:

Re: The ultimate focus test?

Unread post by David Kilpatrick »

I use ISO 320 or 160 mainly. ISO 320 is the highest setting in which very little noise appears in blue skies, so it's ideal for good quality scenes where an action-stopping shutter speed is needed. I use it because it is the highest ISO which produces the quality I want.

David
caporip
Grand Caliph
Posts: 459
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:32 pm

Re: The ultimate focus test?

Unread post by caporip »

David Kilpatrick wrote:I tried focusing on a distant swarm of midges in the last rays of the sun in the churchyard with the 70-200mm HSM on the A900. Guess what? It locked on no problem.
David
I sense a photo challenge!

On a slightly related subject i have just been rereading (due to an imminent house move) some of my old photography books. One in particular always knocks me out and that is Stephen Dalton's caught in motion. He used a "light tunnel" to to photograph flying insects. Theres a shot in there that was a complete accident - when the the infra red trigger was set off by flying aphid. The book shows a crop of, i think, Kodachrome 25 shot and the detail is astonishing. So maybe that should be your next assignment, David
Some days you eat the bear, other days the bear eats you....
My Flickr site:- http://www.flickr.com/photos/rb56/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
artington
Imperial Ambassador
Posts: 553
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: The ultimate focus test?

Unread post by artington »

Sonolta wrote:
David Kilpatrick wrote:The ultimate focus test?
Nope...try focusing on just a single midge. :lol: Your subjects are sorta working like a window screen, and we all know cameras do like to focus on window screens. I'm just sayin'. :twisted:

-Sonota
Absolutely, although personally I usually do this (ie single midge) manually :lol:
User avatar
Greg Beetham
Tower of Babel
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Townsville, Qld. Australia
Contact:

Re: The ultimate focus test?

Unread post by Greg Beetham »

Well I think it's pretty amazing that the focus stopped in the midges instead of focussing on the more solid background...yeah with 1/1000sec and maybe f5.6 (there is depth to the midge cloud, I can see some oof ones) that shot would have been really cool.
Greg
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests